78

Points
Mediatek Helio G90T
Overview - Dimensity 8200 Vs Helio G90T

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 8200 vs Helio G90T SoCs by Mediatek. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Dimensity 8200 43
Helio G90T 20
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Dimensity 8200 40
Helio G90T 14
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Dimensity 8200 86
Helio G90T 57
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Dimensity 8200 56
Helio G90T 30
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Dimensity 8200 Helio G90T
CPU 210639 98285
GPU 339646 80267
Memory 139322 55541
UX 160894 55908
Total score 850501 290001
Key Differences

Pros of Mediatek Dimensity 8200

  • Dimensity 8200 has 51.22% higher CPU clock speed than Helio G90T (3100 vs 2050 MHz).
  • Dimensity 8200 has 200.05% higher memory frequency than Helio G90T (6400 vs 2133 MHz).
  • Dimensity 8200 has 66.67% smaller sized transistor than Helio G90T (4 vs 12 nm).
  • Dimensity 8200 has 193.28% better AnTuTu 9 score than Helio G90T (851 K vs 290 K).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 8200 1054
Helio G90T 545

Multi-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 8200 4010
Helio G90T 1706

Image compression

icon
Dimensity 8200
Helio G90T 94.5

Face detection

icon
Dimensity 8200
Helio G90T 13.8

Speech recognition

icon
Dimensity 8200
Helio G90T 31.1

Machine learning

icon
Dimensity 8200
Helio G90T 25.6

Camera shooting

icon
Dimensity 8200
Helio G90T 13.1

HTML 5

icon
Dimensity 8200
Helio G90T 1.89

SQLite

icon
Dimensity 8200
Helio G90T 494.9

3DMark

Stability %

Graphics test -
Stability 87%

Graphics test 7 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display 120Hz WQHD+ / 180Hz Full HD+ display support Full HD+
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2960 x 1440 2520 x 1080
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR HDR10+ Adaptive support -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

82%
Turbo Clock Speed

3100 MHz

54%
Turbo Clock Speed

2050 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 1x 3.1 GHz – Cortex A78
    3x 3 GHz – Cortex A78
    4x 2 GHz – Cortex A55
    2x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A76
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set - ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache 4 MB -
  • Process 4 nm 12 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP - 5 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G610 MC6 Mali-G76 MC4
  • Architecture Valhall 2 Bifrost
  • GPU frequency - 800 MHz
  • Execution units 6 4
  • Shading units - 64
  • FLOPS - 184 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.2 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 6400 MHz 2133 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 51.2 Gbit/s -
  • Max Size - 10 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
  • Bus 4x 16 Bit 2x 32 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 580(Multi-Core) Yes
  • Storage type UFS 3.1 eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1
  • Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 320MP 1x 64MP, 2x 24MP
  • Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 60FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 21 LTE Cat. 12
  • 5G support Yes No
  • Wi-Fi 6E 5
  • Bluetooth 5.3 5.0
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Mediatek Dimensity 8200

CPU
43%
GPU
40%
Memory
75%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%

Mediatek Helio G90T

CPU
20%
GPU
14%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
57%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote