Dimensity 8200 Vs Helio G95
We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 8200 vs Helio G95 SoCs by Mediatek. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.
Review
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Key Differences
Pros of Mediatek Dimensity 8200
- Dimensity 8200 has 51.22% higher CPU clock speed than Helio G95 (3100 vs 2050 MHz).
- Dimensity 8200 has 200.05% higher memory frequency than Helio G95 (6400 vs 2133 MHz).
- Dimensity 8200 has 66.67% smaller sized transistor than Helio G95 (4 vs 12 nm).
- Dimensity 8200 has 182.81% better AnTuTu 9 score than Helio G95 (851 K vs 301 K).
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarksAnTuTu 9
| CPU | 210639 | 91718 |
| GPU | 339646 | 91234 |
| Memory | 139322 | 58340 |
| UX | 160894 | 59442 |
| Total score | 850501 | 300734 |
GeekBench 5
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
| Image compression | - | 96.2 Mpixels/s |
| Face detection | - | 14.6 images/s |
| Speech recognition | - | 31.1 words/s |
| Machine learning | - | 26.4 images/s |
| Camera shooting | - | 13.8 images/s |
| HTML 5 | - | 1.97 Mnodes/s |
| SQLite | - | 444.9 Mnodes/s |
3DMark
0%
Dimensity 820011%
Helio G95Score: 1464
| Stability | - | 98% |
| Graphics test | - | 8 FPS |
| Score | - | 1464 |
Specifications
Full list of technical specifications of Mediatek Dimensity 8200 and Mediatek Helio G95Display
| Max On-Device Display | 120Hz WQHD+ / 180Hz Full HD+ display support | Full HD+ @ 90Hz |
| Max On-Display Resolution | 2960 x 1440 | 2520 x 1080 |
| Max External Display | - | - |
| HDR | HDR10+ Adaptive support | HDR10+ |
| Color Depth | - | - |
| Color Gamut | - | - |
CPU
90%
Dimensity 820059%
Helio G95
Processor Speed (Frequency)
| Architecture |
1x 3.1 GHz – Cortex A78 3x 3 GHz – Cortex A78 4x 2 GHz – Cortex A55 |
2x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Base Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Turbo Frequency | 3100 MHz | 2050 MHz |
| Instruction set | - | ARMv8.2-A |
| L1 cache | - | - |
| L2 cache | - | - |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | - |
| Process | 4 nm | 12 nm |
| Transistor count | - | - |
| TDP | - | 5 W |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G610 MC6 | Mali-G76 3EEMC4 |
| Architecture | Valhall 2 | Bifrost |
| GPU frequency | - | 900 MHz |
| Execution units | 6 | 4 |
| Shading units | - | 64 |
| FLOPS | - | 195.8 Gigaflops |
| Vulkan version | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX version | 12 | 12 |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDRLPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 6400 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Bus | 4x 16 Bit | 2x 16 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | 51.2 Gbit/s | - |
| Max size | - | 10 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Neural processor (NPU) | MediaTek APU 580(Multi-Core) | Da Vinci |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 |
| Max display resolution | 2960 x 1440 | 2520 x 1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 320MP | 1x 64MP, 2x 24MP |
| Video capture | 4K at 60FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video playback | 4K at 60FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 | H.264, H.265, VP9 |
| Audio codecs | AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
Connectivity
Download Speed
4G (MB/s)
5G (MB/s)
Upload Speed
4G (MB/s)
5G (MB/s)
| Modem | - | - |
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 21 | LTE Cat. 12 |
| 5G support | Yes | No |
| Peak Download speed | Up to 4700 Mbps | - |
| Peak Upload speed | Up to 2500 Mbps | - |
| Wi-Fi | 6E | 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.0 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo |
Info
| Announced Date | December 2022 | September 2020 |
| Class | Flagship | Mid range |
| Model number | - | MT6785V/CD |
| Official page | Dimensity 8200 official site | Helio G95 official site |
Mediatek Dimensity 8200
72.5
Review By TenzysTech
Mediatek Helio G95
27.5
Review By TenzysTech
