78

Points
Mediatek Helio G95
Overview - Dimensity 8200 Vs Helio G95

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 8200 vs Helio G95 SoCs by Mediatek. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Dimensity 8200 43
Helio G95 19
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Dimensity 8200 40
Helio G95 14
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Dimensity 8200 86
Helio G95 57
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Dimensity 8200 56
Helio G95 30
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Dimensity 8200 Helio G95
CPU 210639 91718
GPU 339646 91234
Memory 139322 58340
UX 160894 59442
Total score 850501 300734
Key Differences

Pros of Mediatek Dimensity 8200

  • Dimensity 8200 has 51.22% higher CPU clock speed than Helio G95 (3100 vs 2050 MHz).
  • Dimensity 8200 has 200.05% higher memory frequency than Helio G95 (6400 vs 2133 MHz).
  • Dimensity 8200 has 66.67% smaller sized transistor than Helio G95 (4 vs 12 nm).
  • Dimensity 8200 has 182.81% better AnTuTu 9 score than Helio G95 (851 K vs 301 K).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 8200 1054
Helio G95 529

Multi-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 8200 4010
Helio G95 1680

Image compression

icon
Dimensity 8200
Helio G95 96.2

Face detection

icon
Dimensity 8200
Helio G95 14.6

Speech recognition

icon
Dimensity 8200
Helio G95 31.1

Machine learning

icon
Dimensity 8200
Helio G95 26.4

Camera shooting

icon
Dimensity 8200
Helio G95 13.8

HTML 5

icon
Dimensity 8200
Helio G95 1.97

SQLite

icon
Dimensity 8200
Helio G95 444.9

3DMark

Stability %

Graphics test -
Stability 98%

Graphics test 8 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display 120Hz WQHD+ / 180Hz Full HD+ display support Full HD+ @ 90Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2960 x 1440 2520 x 1080
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR HDR10+ Adaptive support HDR10+
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

82%
Turbo Clock Speed

3100 MHz

54%
Turbo Clock Speed

2050 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 1x 3.1 GHz – Cortex A78
    3x 3 GHz – Cortex A78
    4x 2 GHz – Cortex A55
    2x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A76
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set - ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache 4 MB -
  • Process 4 nm 12 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP - 5 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G610 MC6 Mali-G76 3EEMC4
  • Architecture Valhall 2 Bifrost
  • GPU frequency - 900 MHz
  • Execution units 6 4
  • Shading units - 64
  • FLOPS - 195.8 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.2 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 6400 MHz 2133 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 51.2 Gbit/s -
  • Max Size - 10 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDRLPDDR4X
  • Bus 4x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 580(Multi-Core) Da Vinci
  • Storage type UFS 3.1 eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1
  • Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 320MP 1x 64MP, 2x 24MP
  • Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 60FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 21 LTE Cat. 12
  • 5G support Yes No
  • Wi-Fi 6E 5
  • Bluetooth 5.3 5.0
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Mediatek Dimensity 8200

CPU
43%
GPU
40%
Memory
75%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%

Mediatek Helio G95

CPU
19%
GPU
14%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
57%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote