78

Points
Mediatek Helio G99
Overview - Dimensity 8200 Vs Helio G99

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 8200 vs Helio G99 SoCs by Mediatek. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Dimensity 8200 43
Helio G99 20
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Dimensity 8200 40
Helio G99 15
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Dimensity 8200 86
Helio G99 79
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Dimensity 8200 56
Helio G99 38
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Dimensity 8200 Helio G99
CPU 210639 103357
GPU 339646 86376
Memory 139322 89007
UX 160894 101683
Total score 850501 380423
Key Differences

Pros of Mediatek Dimensity 8200

  • Dimensity 8200 has 40.91% higher CPU clock speed than Helio G99 (3100 vs 2200 MHz).
  • Dimensity 8200 has 50.02% higher memory frequency than Helio G99 (6400 vs 4266 MHz).
  • Dimensity 8200 has 33.33% smaller sized transistor than Helio G99 (4 vs 6 nm).
  • Dimensity 8200 has 123.57% better AnTuTu 9 score than Helio G99 (851 K vs 380 K).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 8200 1054
Helio G99 543

Multi-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 8200 4010
Helio G99 1740

Image compression

icon
Dimensity 8200
Helio G99 114.8

Face detection

icon
Dimensity 8200
Helio G99 14.3

Speech recognition

icon
Dimensity 8200
Helio G99 36.1

Machine learning

icon
Dimensity 8200
Helio G99 30.2

Camera shooting

icon
Dimensity 8200
Helio G99 16.4

HTML 5

icon
Dimensity 8200
Helio G99 1.73

SQLite

icon
Dimensity 8200
Helio G99 599.6

3DMark

Stability %

Graphics test -
Stability 99%

Graphics test 8 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display 120Hz WQHD+ / 180Hz Full HD+ display support Full HD+ @120 Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2960 x 1440 2520 x 1080
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR HDR10+ Adaptive support -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

82%
Turbo Clock Speed

3100 MHz

58%
Turbo Clock Speed

2200 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 1x 3.1 GHz – Cortex A78
    3x 3 GHz – Cortex A78
    4x 2 GHz – Cortex A55
    2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set - ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache 4 MB -
  • Process 4 nm 6 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP - -
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G610 MC6 Mali-G57 MC2
  • Architecture Valhall 2 Valhall
  • GPU frequency - 1000 MHz
  • Execution units 6 2
  • Shading units - 32
  • FLOPS - -
  • Vulkan version 1.2 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 6400 MHz 4266 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 51.2 Gbit/s 17.1 Gbit/s
  • Max Size - 10 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
  • Bus 4x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 580(Multi-Core) Yes
  • Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 2.2
  • Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 320MP 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP
  • Video capture 4K at 60FPS 2K at 30FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 60FPS 2K at 30FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 21 LTE Cat. 13
  • 5G support Yes No
  • Wi-Fi 6E 5
  • Bluetooth 5.3 5.2
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Mediatek Dimensity 8200

CPU
43%
GPU
40%
Memory
75%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%

Mediatek Helio G99

CPU
20%
GPU
15%
Memory
50%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote