Menu

55

Points
Mediatek Dimensity 8200

Dimensity 8200

45

Points
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2

Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
Overview - Dimensity 8200 Vs Snapdragon 4 Gen 2

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 8200 vs Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 SoCs by Mediatek and Qualcomm respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Dimensity 8200 41
Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 27
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Dimensity 8200 39
Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 22
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Dimensity 8200 86
Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 86
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Dimensity 8200 55
Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 45
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Dimensity 8200 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
CPU 210639 131871
GPU 339646 163570
Memory 139322 114048
UX 160894 94884
Total score 850501 504373
Key Differences

Pros of Mediatek Dimensity 8200

  • Dimensity 8200 has 40.91% higher CPU clock speed than Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (3100 vs 2200 MHz).
  • Dimensity 8200 has 100.00% higher memory frequency than Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (6400 vs 3200 MHz).
  • Dimensity 8200 has 68.63% better AnTuTu 9 score than Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (851 K vs 504 K).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 8200 1054
Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 916

Multi-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 8200 4010
Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 2106

3DMark

0%
Dimensity 8200
Stability %

Graphics test -
N/A
Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
Stability %

Graphics test -
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display 120Hz WQHD+ / 180Hz Full HD+ display support FHD+ @ 120 Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2960 x 1440 1200 x 2520
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR HDR10+ Adaptive support -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

77%
Turbo Clock Speed

3100 MHz

54%
Turbo Clock Speed

2200 MHz

49%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

49%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 1x 3.1 GHz – Cortex A78
    3x 3 GHz – Cortex A78
    4x 2 GHz – Cortex A55
     2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A78
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set - ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache 4 MB -
  • Process 4 nm 4 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP - -
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G610 MC6 Adreno 613
  • Architecture Valhall 2 Adreno 600
  • GPU frequency - 955 MHz
  • Execution units 6 -
  • Shading units - -
  • FLOPS - -
  • Vulkan version 1.2 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 6400 MHz 3200 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 51.2 Gbit/s 25.6 Gbit/s
  • Max Size - -
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
  • Bus 4x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 580(Multi-Core) Yes
  • Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1
  • Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 320MP 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP
  • Video capture 4K at 60FPS 1K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 60FPS 1080p at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - Snapdragon X61
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 21 LTE Cat. 18
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • 5G Download Speed 4700 Mbps 2500 Mbps
  • 4G Download Speed - -
  • 5G Upload Speed 2500 Mbps 900 Mbps
  • 4G Upload Speed - -
  • Wi-Fi 6E 5
  • Bluetooth 5.3 5.1
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Mediatek Dimensity 8200

Mediatek Dimensity 8200
CPU
41%
GPU
39%
Memory
75%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%

Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2

Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
CPU
27%
GPU
22%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote