Overview - Dimensity 8200 Vs Snapdragon 778G Plus

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 8200 vs Snapdragon 778G Plus SoCs by Mediatek and Qualcomm respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Dimensity 8200 43
Snapdragon 778G Plus 33
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Dimensity 8200 40
Snapdragon 778G Plus 26
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Dimensity 8200 86
Snapdragon 778G Plus 79
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Dimensity 8200 56
Snapdragon 778G Plus 46
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Dimensity 8200 Snapdragon 778G Plus
CPU 210639 166382
GPU 339646 177972
Memory 139322 106394
UX 160894 130486
Total score 850501 581234
Key Differences

Pros of Mediatek Dimensity 8200

  • Dimensity 8200 has 24.00% higher CPU clock speed than Snapdragon 778G Plus (3100 vs 2500 MHz).
  • Dimensity 8200 has 100.00% higher memory frequency than Snapdragon 778G Plus (6400 vs 3200 MHz).
  • Dimensity 8200 has 33.33% smaller sized transistor than Snapdragon 778G Plus (4 vs 6 nm).
  • Dimensity 8200 has 46.33% better AnTuTu 9 score than Snapdragon 778G Plus (851 K vs 581 K).
  • Dimensity 8200 Support 100.00% higher memory bandwidth than Snapdragon 778G Plus (51.2 vs 25.6 MHz).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 8200 1054
Snapdragon 778G Plus 816

Multi-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 8200 4010
Snapdragon 778G Plus 2971

3DMark

Stability %

Graphics test -
Stability %

Graphics test 16 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display 120Hz WQHD+ / 180Hz Full HD+ display support FHD+ @ 144 Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2960 x 1440 2520 x 1080
  • Max External Display - 4K @ 60 Hz
  • HDR HDR10+ Adaptive support HDR10+, HDR10
  • Color Depth - Up to 10-bit
  • Color Gamut - Rec. 2020
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

82%
Turbo Clock Speed

3100 MHz

66%
Turbo Clock Speed

2500 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

86%
Base Frequency

1900 MHz

  • Architecture 1x 3.1 GHz – Cortex A78
    3x 3 GHz – Cortex A78
    4x 2 GHz – Cortex A55
    1x 2.5 GHz – Kryo 670 Prime (Cortex-A78)
    3x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 670 Gold (Cortex-A78)
    4x 1.9 GHz – Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55)
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set - ARMv8.4-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - 2 MB
  • L3 cache 4 MB -
  • Process 4 nm 6 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP - 5 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G610 MC6 Adreno 642L
  • Architecture Valhall 2 Adreno 600
  • GPU frequency - 550 MHz
  • Execution units 6 2
  • Shading units - 384
  • FLOPS - 845 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.2 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 6400 MHz 3200 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 51.2 Gbit/s 25.6 Gbit/s
  • Max Size - 16 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
  • Bus 4x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 580(Multi-Core) Hexagon 770
  • Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 2.2, UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1
  • Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 320MP 1x 192MP
  • Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 60FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - X53
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 21 LTE Cat. 24
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • Wi-Fi 6E 6
  • Bluetooth 5.3 5.2
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Mediatek Dimensity 8200

CPU
43%
GPU
40%
Memory
75%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%

Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus

CPU
33%
GPU
26%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote