Overview - Dimensity 8200 Vs Snapdragon 888 Plus

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 8200 vs Snapdragon 888 Plus SoCs by Mediatek and Qualcomm respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Dimensity 8200 43
Snapdragon 888 Plus 43
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Dimensity 8200 40
Snapdragon 888 Plus 39
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Dimensity 8200 86
Snapdragon 888 Plus 82
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Dimensity 8200 56
Snapdragon 888 Plus 55
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Dimensity 8200 Snapdragon 888 Plus
CPU 210639 216591
GPU 339646 324286
Memory 139322 138188
UX 160894 167760
Total score 850501 846825
Key Differences

Pros of Mediatek Dimensity 8200

  • Dimensity 8200 has 3.51% higher CPU clock speed than Snapdragon 888 Plus (3100 vs 2995 MHz).
  • Dimensity 8200 has 100.00% higher memory frequency than Snapdragon 888 Plus (6400 vs 3200 MHz).
  • Dimensity 8200 has 20% smaller sized transistor than Snapdragon 888 Plus (4 vs 5 nm).
  • Dimensity 8200 has 0.43% better AnTuTu 9 score than Snapdragon 888 Plus (851 K vs 847 K).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 8200 1054
Snapdragon 888 Plus 1171

Multi-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 8200 4010
Snapdragon 888 Plus 3704

3DMark

Stability %

Graphics test -
Stability 99%

Graphics test 33 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display 120Hz WQHD+ / 180Hz Full HD+ display support 4K Ultra HD @ 60 Hz, QHD+ @ 144 Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2960 x 1440 3840 x 2160
  • Max External Display - 4K @ 60 Hz
  • HDR HDR10+ Adaptive support Hybrid Log Gamma (HLG), HDR10+, Dolby Vision®, HDR10
  • Color Depth - Up to 10-bit
  • Color Gamut - Rec. 2020
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

82%
Turbo Clock Speed

3100 MHz

79%
Turbo Clock Speed

2995 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

82%
Base Frequency

1800 MHz

  • Architecture 1x 3.1 GHz – Cortex A78
    3x 3 GHz – Cortex A78
    4x 2 GHz – Cortex A55
    1x 2.995 GHz – Kryo 680 Prime (Cortex-X1)
    3x 2.42 GHz – Kryo 680 Gold (Cortex-A78)
    4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 680 Silver (Cortex-A55)
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set - ARMv8.4-A
  • L1 cache - 512 KB
  • L2 cache - 1 MB
  • L3 cache 4 MB 4 MB
  • Process 4 nm 5 nm
  • Transistor count - 10.3 Billion
  • TDP - 8 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G610 MC6 Adreno 660
  • Architecture Valhall 2 Adreno 600
  • GPU frequency - 905 MHz
  • Execution units 6 2
  • Shading units - 512
  • FLOPS - 1853 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.2 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 6400 MHz 3200 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 51.2 Gbit/s 51.2 Gbit/s
  • Max Size - 24 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
  • Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 580(Multi-Core) Hexagon 780
  • Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1
  • Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 3840 x 2160
  • Max camera resolution 1x 320MP 1x 2000MP, 2x 25MP
  • Video capture 4K at 60FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 60FPS 8K at 30FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - X60
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 21 LTE Cat. 22
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • Wi-Fi 6E 6
  • Bluetooth 5.3 5.2
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Mediatek Dimensity 8200

CPU
43%
GPU
40%
Memory
75%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%

Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus

CPU
43%
GPU
39%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
82%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote