78

Points
Mediatek Dimensity 900

78

Points
Google Tensor
Overview - Dimensity 900 Vs Tensor

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 900 vs Tensor SoCs by Mediatek and Google respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Dimensity 900 25
Tensor 36
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Dimensity 900 19
Tensor 34
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Dimensity 900 79
Tensor 82
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Dimensity 900 41
Tensor 51
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Dimensity 900 Tensor
CPU 125384 181161
GPU 125188 294446
Memory 83836 103174
UX 133752 145388
Total score 468160 724169
Key Differences

Pros of Mediatek Dimensity 900

  • Dimensity 900 has 6.13% higher GPU clock speed than Tensor (900 vs 848 MHz).

Pros of Google Tensor

  • Tensor has 16.67% higher CPU clock speed than Dimensity 900 (2800 vs 2400 MHz).
  • Tensor has 16.67% smaller sized transistor than Dimensity 900 (5 vs 6 nm).
  • Tensor has 54.68% better AnTuTu 9 score than Dimensity 900 (724 K vs 468 K ).
  • Tensor has latest instruction set, hence better than Dimensity 900.
  • Tensor Support 178.26% higher memory bandwidth than Dimensity 900 (51.2 vs 18.4 GB/s).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 900 706
Tensor 1026

Multi-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 900 2137
Tensor 2879

Image compression

icon
Dimensity 900 123.5
Tensor

Face detection

icon
Dimensity 900 20.5
Tensor

Speech recognition

icon
Dimensity 900 38.3
Tensor

Machine learning

icon
Dimensity 900 33.1
Tensor

Camera shooting

icon
Dimensity 900 19.6
Tensor

HTML 5

icon
Dimensity 900 2.51
Tensor

SQLite

icon
Dimensity 900 632.6
Tensor

3DMark

Stability 98%

Graphics test 12 FPS
Stability 56%

Graphics test 37 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display FHD+@120Hz 4k, FHD+ @ 60 Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2520 x 1080 3840 x 2160
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR HDR HDR
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

63%
Turbo Clock Speed

2400 MHz

74%
Turbo Clock Speed

2800 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

82%
Base Frequency

1800 MHz

  • Architecture 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
    2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X1
    2x 2.25 GHz – Cortex A76
    4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8-A ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - 3 MB
  • L3 cache - 4 MB
  • Process 6 nm 5 nm
  • Transistor count 10 Billion -
  • TDP 10 W 5.6 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G68 MC4 Mali-G78 MP20
  • Architecture Valhall 2 Valhall
  • GPU frequency 900 MHz 848 MHz
  • Execution units 4 20
  • Shading units 48 320
  • FLOPS - -
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 3200 MHz 3200 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 18.4 Gbit/s 51.2 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 16 GB 12 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
  • Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Yes Tensor Processing Unit
  • Storage type UFS 2.1, UFS 3.1 UFS 3.1
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 3840 x 2160
  • Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
  • Video capture 4K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - Exynos 5300g
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 24
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • Wi-Fi 6 6
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.2
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Mediatek Dimensity 900

CPU
25%
GPU
19%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%

Google Tensor

CPU
36%
GPU
34%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
82%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote