Menu

78

Points
Mediatek Dimensity 900

Dimensity 900

78

Points
Samsung Exynos 1380

Exynos 1380
Overview - Dimensity 900 Vs Exynos 1380

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 900 vs Exynos 1380 SoCs by Mediatek and Samsung respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Dimensity 900 25
Exynos 1380 30
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Dimensity 900 19
Exynos 1380 22
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Dimensity 900 79
Exynos 1380 82
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Dimensity 900 41
Exynos 1380 45
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Dimensity 900 Exynos 1380
CPU 125384 151675
GPU 125188 135413
Memory 83836 110932
UX 133752 124860
Total score 468160 522880
Key Differences

Pros of Samsung Exynos 1380

  • Exynos 1380 has 5.56% higher GPU clock speed than Dimensity 900 (950 vs 900 MHz).
  • Exynos 1380 has 16.67% smaller sized transistor than Dimensity 900 (5 vs 6 nm).
  • Exynos 1380 has 11.69% better AnTuTu 9 score than Dimensity 900 (523 K vs 468 K ).
  • Exynos 1380 has latest instruction set, hence better than Dimensity 900.
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 900 706
Exynos 1380 761

Multi-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 900 2137
Exynos 1380 2696

Image compression

icon
Dimensity 900 123.5
Exynos 1380

Face detection

icon
Dimensity 900 20.5
Exynos 1380

Speech recognition

icon
Dimensity 900 38.3
Exynos 1380

Machine learning

icon
Dimensity 900 33.1
Exynos 1380

Camera shooting

icon
Dimensity 900 19.6
Exynos 1380

HTML 5

icon
Dimensity 900 2.51
Exynos 1380

SQLite

icon
Dimensity 900 632.6
Exynos 1380

3DMark

11%
Dimensity 900
Stability 98%

Graphics test 12 FPS
N/A
Exynos 1380
Stability %

Graphics test -
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display FHD+@120Hz FHD+ @ 144 Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2520 x 1080 2960 x 1440
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR HDR -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

63%
Turbo Clock Speed

2400 MHz

63%
Turbo Clock Speed

2400 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
     4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78
    4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8-A ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 6 nm 5 nm
  • Transistor count 10 Billion -
  • TDP 10 W -
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G68 MC4 Mali-G68 MP5
  • Architecture Valhall 2 Valhall 2
  • GPU frequency 900 MHz 950 MHz
  • Execution units 4 5
  • Shading units 48 -
  • FLOPS - 608 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 3200 MHz 3200 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 18.4 Gbit/s -
  • Max Size 16 GB 8 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
  • Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Yes Yes
  • Storage type UFS 2.1, UFS 3.1 UFS 3.1
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2960 x 1440
  • Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP 1x 200MP
  • Video capture 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP8
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 18
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • Wi-Fi 6 6
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.2
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Mediatek Dimensity 900

Mediatek Dimensity 900
CPU
25%
GPU
19%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%

Samsung Exynos 1380

Samsung Exynos 1380
CPU
30%
GPU
22%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
82%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote