78

Points
Mediatek Dimensity 900

78

Points
Samsung Exynos 850
Overview - Dimensity 900 Vs Exynos 850

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 900 vs Exynos 850 SoCs by Mediatek and Samsung respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Dimensity 900 25
Exynos 850 9
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Dimensity 900 19
Exynos 850 6
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Dimensity 900 79
Exynos 850 71
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Dimensity 900 41
Exynos 850 29
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Dimensity 900 Exynos 850
CPU 125384 47291
GPU 125188 21386
Memory 83836 40704
UX 133752 22040
Total score 468160 131421
Key Differences

Pros of Mediatek Dimensity 900

  • Dimensity 900 has 9.76% higher GPU clock speed than Exynos 850 (900 vs 820 MHz).
  • Dimensity 900 has 71.49% higher memory frequency than Exynos 850 (3200 vs 1866 MHz).
  • Dimensity 900 has 25% smaller sized transistor than Exynos 850 (6 vs 8 nm).
  • Dimensity 900 has 256.23% better AnTuTu 9 score than Exynos 850 (468 K vs 131 K).
  • Dimensity 900 Support 300.00% higher memory bandwidth than Exynos 850 (1200 vs 300 MHz).

Pros of Samsung Exynos 850

  • Exynos 850 has latest instruction set, hence better than Dimensity 900.
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 900 706
Exynos 850 150

Multi-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 900 2137
Exynos 850 937

Image compression

icon
Dimensity 900 123.5
Exynos 850 74.3

Face detection

icon
Dimensity 900 20.5
Exynos 850 10.4

Speech recognition

icon
Dimensity 900 38.3
Exynos 850 16.7

Machine learning

icon
Dimensity 900 33.1
Exynos 850 12.4

Camera shooting

icon
Dimensity 900 19.6
Exynos 850 5.29

HTML 5

icon
Dimensity 900 2.51
Exynos 850 1.38

SQLite

icon
Dimensity 900 632.6
Exynos 850 356.2

3DMark

Stability 98%

Graphics test 12 FPS
Stability 98%

Graphics test 3 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display FHD+@120Hz Full HD+
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR HDR -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

63%
Turbo Clock Speed

2400 MHz

0%
Turbo Clock Speed

MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
    8x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8-A ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 6 nm 8 nm
  • Transistor count 10 Billion -
  • TDP 10 W 3 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G68 MC4 Mali-G52 MP1
  • Architecture Valhall 2 Bifrost
  • GPU frequency 900 MHz 820 MHz
  • Execution units 4 6
  • Shading units 48 96
  • FLOPS - 126 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 3200 MHz 1866 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 18.4 Gbit/s -
  • Max Size 16 GB 8 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
  • Bus 4x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Yes No
  • Storage type UFS 2.1, UFS 3.1 eMMC 5.1
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP
  • Video capture 4K at 30FPS 1K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 30FPS 1080p at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 13
  • 5G support Yes No
  • Wi-Fi 6 5
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.1
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Mediatek Dimensity 900

CPU
25%
GPU
19%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%

Samsung Exynos 850

CPU
9%
GPU
6%
Memory
22%
Energy efficiency and battery life
71%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote