Overview - Dimensity 9000 Plus Vs Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 9000 Plus vs Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2 SoCs by Mediatek and Qualcomm respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Dimensity 9000 Plus 53
Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2 54
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Dimensity 9000 Plus 50
Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2 46
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Dimensity 9000 Plus 86
Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2 100
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Dimensity 9000 Plus 63
Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2 67
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Dimensity 9000 Plus Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2
CPU 291317 246704
GPU 430867 352464
Memory 218270 176323
UX 206140 171430
Total score 1146594 946921
Key Differences

Pros of Mediatek Dimensity 9000 Plus

  • Dimensity 9000 Plus has 9.97% higher CPU clock speed than Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2 (3200 vs 2910 MHz).
  • Dimensity 9000 Plus has 17.19% higher memory frequency than Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2 (3750 vs 3200 MHz).
  • Dimensity 9000 Plus has 21.09% better AnTuTu 9 score than Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2 (1,147 K vs 947 K).
  • Dimensity 9000 Plus Support 134.38% higher memory bandwidth than Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2 (60 vs 25.6 MHz).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 9000 Plus 1349
Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2 1656

Multi-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 9000 Plus 4342
Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2 4482

3DMark

Stability 86%

Graphics test 51 FPS
Stability 85%

Graphics test -
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display FHD+ @ 180Hz, WQHD+ @ 144Hz QHD+ @ 120 Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2960 x 1440 3360 x 1600
  • Max External Display 2K @ 144 Hz 4K @ 60 Hz
  • HDR HDR10+ Adaptive HDR10+
  • Color Depth - Up to 10-bit
  • Color Gamut - Rec. 2020
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

85%
Turbo Clock Speed

3200 MHz

77%
Turbo Clock Speed

2910 MHz

82%
Base Frequency

1800 MHz

82%
Base Frequency

1800 MHz

  • Architecture 1x 3.2 GHz – Cortex-X2
    3x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-A710
    4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A510
    1x 2.91 GHz – Cortex-X2
    3x 2.49 GHz – Cortex-A710
    4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A510
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv9-A ARMv9-A
  • L1 cache 1024 KB -
  • L2 cache 3.5 MB -
  • L3 cache 8 MB -
  • Process 4 nm -
  • Transistor count - 4 Billion
  • TDP 4 W -
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G710 MC10 Adreno 725
  • Architecture Valhall 3 Adreno 700
  • GPU frequency - 580 MHz
  • Execution units 10 -
  • Shading units 512 -
  • FLOPS - -
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.2
  • OpenCL version 2 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 3750 MHz 3200 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 60 Gbit/s 25.6 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 24 GB 16 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5x LPDDR5
  • Bus 4x16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Yes Yes
  • Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 3.1
  • Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 3360 x 1600
  • Max camera resolution 1x 320MP, 3x 32MP 1x 200MP
  • Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - X62
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • Wi-Fi 6 6
  • Bluetooth 5.3 5.3
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Mediatek Dimensity 9000 Plus

CPU
53%
GPU
50%
Memory
44%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%

Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2

CPU
54%
GPU
46%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
100%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote