Dimensity 9000 Plus Vs Exynos 850
We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 9000 Plus vs Exynos 850 SoCs by Mediatek and Samsung respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.
Review
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Key Differences
Pros of Mediatek Dimensity 9000 Plus
- Dimensity 9000 Plus has 100.96% higher memory frequency than Exynos 850 (3750 vs 1866 MHz).
- Dimensity 9000 Plus has 50% smaller sized transistor than Exynos 850 (4 vs 8 nm).
- Dimensity 9000 Plus has 772.46% better AnTuTu 9 score than Exynos 850 (1,147 K vs 131 K).
- Dimensity 9000 Plus has latest instruction set, hence better than Exynos 850.
- Dimensity 9000 Plus Support 753.33% higher memory bandwidth then Exynos 850 (2560 vs 300 MHz).
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarksAnTuTu 9
| CPU | 291317 | 47291 |
| GPU | 430867 | 21386 |
| Memory | 218270 | 40704 |
| UX | 206140 | 22040 |
| Total score | 1146594 | 131421 |
GeekBench 5
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
| Image compression | - | 74.3 Mpixels/s |
| Face detection | - | 10.4 images/s |
| Speech recognition | - | 16.7 words/s |
| Machine learning | - | 12.4 images/s |
| Camera shooting | - | 5.29 images/s |
| HTML 5 | - | 1.38 Mnodes/s |
| SQLite | - | 356.2 Mnodes/s |
3DMark
67%
Dimensity 9000+4%
Exynos 850Score: 8685
| Stability | 86% | 98% |
| Graphics test | 51 FPS | 3 FPS |
| Score | 8685 | 505 |
Specifications
Full list of technical specifications of Mediatek Dimensity 9000 Plus and Samsung Exynos 850Display
| Max On-Device Display | FHD+ @ 180Hz, WQHD+ @ 144Hz | Full HD+ |
| Max On-Display Resolution | 2960 x 1440 | 2520 x 1080 |
| Max External Display | 2K @ 144 Hz | - |
| HDR | HDR10+ Adaptive | - |
| Color Depth | - | - |
| Color Gamut | - | - |
CPU
92%
Dimensity 9000+0%
Exynos 850
Processor Speed (Frequency)
| Architecture |
1x 3.2 GHz – Cortex-X2 3x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-A710 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A510 |
8x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Base Frequency | 1800 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Turbo Frequency | 3200 MHz | - |
| Instruction set | ARMv9-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| L1 cache | 1024 KB | - |
| L2 cache | 3.5 MB | - |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | - |
| Process | 4 nm | 8 nm |
| Transistor count | - | - |
| TDP | 4 W | 3 W |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G710 MC10 | Mali-G52 MP1 |
| Architecture | Valhall 3 | Bifrost |
| GPU frequency | - | 820 MHz |
| Execution units | 10 | 6 |
| Shading units | 512 | 96 |
| FLOPS | - | 126 Gigaflops |
| Vulkan version | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenCL version | 2 | 2.0 |
| DirectX version | 12 | 12 |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR5x | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 3750 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Bus | 4x16 Bit | 2x 16 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | 60 Gbit/s | - |
| Max size | 24 GB | 8 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | No |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Max display resolution | 2960 x 1440 | 2520 x 1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 320MP, 3x 32MP | 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP |
| Video capture | 4K at 60FPS | 1K at 60FPS |
| Video playback | 4K at 60FPS | 1080p at 60FPS |
| Video codecs | H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 | H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 |
| Audio codecs | AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC | AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
Connectivity
Download Speed
4G (MB/s)
5G (MB/s)
Upload Speed
4G (MB/s)
5G (MB/s)
| Modem | - | - |
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 24 | LTE Cat. 13 |
| 5G support | Yes | No |
| Peak Download speed | Up to 7168 Mbps | - |
| Peak Upload speed | Up to 2560 Mbps | - |
| Wi-Fi | 6 | 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.1 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo |
Info
| Announced Date | July 2022 | May 2020 |
| Class | Flagship | Low end |
| Model number | - | S5E3830 |
| Official page | Dimensity 9000 Plus official site | Exynos 850 official site |
Mediatek Dimensity 9000 Plus
73.5
Review By TenzysTech
Samsung Exynos 850
23.5
Review By TenzysTech
