Menu

78

Points
Mediatek Dimensity 920

Dimensity 920

78

Points
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus

Snapdragon 778G Plus
Overview - Dimensity 920 Vs Snapdragon 778G Plus

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 920 vs Snapdragon 778G Plus SoCs by Mediatek and Qualcomm respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Dimensity 920 29
Snapdragon 778G Plus 33
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Dimensity 920 22
Snapdragon 778G Plus 26
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Dimensity 920 79
Snapdragon 778G Plus 79
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Dimensity 920 43
Snapdragon 778G Plus 46
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Dimensity 920 Snapdragon 778G Plus
CPU 139277 166382
GPU 128453 177972
Memory 96272 106394
UX 134315 130486
Total score 498317 581234
Key Differences

Pros of Mediatek Dimensity 920

  • Dimensity 920 has 72.73% higher GPU clock speed than Snapdragon 778G Plus (950 vs 550 MHz).

Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus

  • Snapdragon 778G Plus has 16.64% better AnTuTu 9 score than Dimensity 920 (581 K vs 498 K ).
  • Snapdragon 778G Plus has latest instruction set, hence better than Dimensity 920.
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 920 792
Snapdragon 778G Plus 816

Multi-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 920 2592
Snapdragon 778G Plus 2971

3DMark

10%
Dimensity 920
Stability 99%

Graphics test 12 FPS
14%
Snapdragon 778G Plus
Stability %

Graphics test 16 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display FHD+ @ 120Hz FHD+ @ 144 Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
  • Max External Display - 4K @ 60 Hz
  • HDR HDR10 HDR10+, HDR10
  • Color Depth Up to 10-bit Up to 10-bit
  • Color Gamut Rec2020 Rec. 2020
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

66%
Turbo Clock Speed

2500 MHz

66%
Turbo Clock Speed

2500 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

86%
Base Frequency

1900 MHz

  • Architecture 2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A78
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
     1x 2.5 GHz – Kryo 670 Prime (Cortex-A78)
    3x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 670 Gold (Cortex-A78)
    4x 1.9 GHz – Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55)
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8-A ARMv8.4-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - 2 MB
  • L3 cache 2 MB -
  • Process 6 nm 6 nm
  • Transistor count 12 Billion -
  • TDP 10 W 5 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G68 MC4 Adreno 642L
  • Architecture Valhall 2 Adreno 600
  • GPU frequency 950 MHz 550 MHz
  • Execution units 4 2
  • Shading units 64 384
  • FLOPS 684 Gigaflops 845 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 3200 MHz 3200 MHz
  • Max bandwidth - 25.6 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 16 GB 16 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
  • Bus 4x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 3.0 Hexagon 770
  • Storage type UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1 UFS 2.2, UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP 1x 192MP
  • Video capture 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
  • Audio codecs AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - X53
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 24
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • Wi-Fi 6 6
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.2
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Mediatek Dimensity 920

Mediatek Dimensity 920
CPU
29%
GPU
22%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%

Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus

Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
CPU
33%
GPU
26%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote