78

Points
Google Tensor
Overview - Dimensity 9200 Vs Tensor

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 9200 vs Tensor SoCs by Mediatek and Google respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Dimensity 9200 58
Tensor 36
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Dimensity 9200 60
Tensor 34
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Dimensity 9200 86
Tensor 82
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Dimensity 9200 68
Tensor 51
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Key Differences

Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 9200

  • Dimensity 9200 has 8.93% higher CPU clock speed than Tensor (3050 vs 2800 MHz).
  • Dimensity 9200 has 15.68% higher GPU clock speed than Tensor (981 vs 848 MHz).
  • Dimensity 9200 has 166.66% higher memory frequency than Tensor (8533 vs 3200 MHz).
  • Dimensity 9200 has 20% smaller sized transistor than Tensor (4 vs 5 nm).
  • Dimensity 9200 has 78.08% better AnTuTu 9 score than Tensor (1,290 K vs 724 K).
  • Dimensity 9200 has latest instruction set, hence better than Tensor.
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 9200 1540
Tensor 1026

Multi-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 9200 5210
Tensor 2879

3DMark

Stability 86%

Graphics test 72 FPS
Stability 56%

Graphics test 37 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display 4K @ 60Hz, QHD+ @ 168Hz 4k, FHD+ @ 60 Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution - 3840 x 2160
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR HDR10+ HDR
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

81%
Turbo Clock Speed

3050 MHz

74%
Turbo Clock Speed

2800 MHz

82%
Base Frequency

1800 MHz

82%
Base Frequency

1800 MHz

  • Architecture 1x 3.05 GHz – Cortex-X3
    3x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-A715
    4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A510
    2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X1
    2x 2.25 GHz – Cortex A76
    4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv9-A ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - 3 MB
  • L3 cache 8 MB 4 MB
  • Process 4 nm 5 nm
  • Transistor count 17 Billion -
  • TDP - 5.6 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G715 Immortalis MC11 Mali-G78 MP20
  • Architecture Valhall 3 Valhall
  • GPU frequency 981 MHz 848 MHz
  • Execution units 11 20
  • Shading units - 320
  • FLOPS - -
  • Vulkan version 1.3 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

memory-frequency

Memory frequency

8533 MHz
memory-frequency

Memory frequency

3200 MHz
memory-frequency

Max bandwidth

-
memory-frequency

Max bandwidth

51.2 Gbit/s
memory-frequency

Max Size

24 GB
memory-frequency

Max Size

12 GB

  • Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5
  • Bus 4 x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 690 AI processor Tensor Processing Unit
  • Storage type UFS 4.0 UFS 3.1
  • Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 3840 x 2160
  • Max camera resolution 1 x 320MP 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
  • Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

4G Speed
  • N/A
    Download Speed
  • N/A
    Upload Speed
  • N/A
    Download Speed
  • N/A
    Upload Speed
5G Speed
  • 7900 Mbps
    Download Speed
  • -
    Upload Speed
  • 7350 Mbps
    Download Speed
  • 3670 Mbps
    Upload Speed

  • Modem 5G R16 modem Exynos 5300g
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • Wi-Fi 7 6
  • Bluetooth 5.3 5.2
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

MediaTek Dimensity 9200

CPU
58%
GPU
60%
Memory
100%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%

Google Tensor

CPU
36%
GPU
34%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
82%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote