Menu

60

Points
MediaTek Dimensity 9200

Dimensity 9200

55

Points
Google Tensor G3

Tensor G3
Overview - Dimensity 9200 Vs Tensor G3

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 9200 vs Tensor G3 SoCs by Mediatek and Google respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core and 9-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Dimensity 9200 48
Tensor G3 43
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Dimensity 9200 47
Tensor G3 36
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Dimensity 9200 86
Tensor G3 86
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Dimensity 9200 60
Tensor G3 55
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Dimensity 9200 Tensor G3
CPU 275050 281756
GPU 568108 364449
Memory 240410 148341
UX 206002 181913
Total score 1289570 976459
Key Differences

Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 9200

  • Dimensity 9200 has 4.81% higher CPU clock speed than Tensor G3 (3050 vs 2910 MHz).
  • Dimensity 9200 has 10.22% higher GPU clock speed than Tensor G3 (981 vs 890 MHz).
  • Dimensity 9200 has 103.17% higher memory frequency than Tensor G3 (8533 vs 4200 MHz).
  • Dimensity 9200 has 32.07% better AnTuTu 9 score than Tensor G3 (1,290 K vs 976 K).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 9200 1540
Tensor G3 1626

Multi-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 9200 5210
Tensor G3 3598

3DMark

62%
Dimensity 9200
Stability 86%

Graphics test 72 FPS
N/A
Tensor G3
Stability %

Graphics test -
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display 4K @ 60Hz, QHD+ @ 168Hz 4K
  • Max On-Display Resolution - 3840 x 2160
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR HDR10+ -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

75%
Turbo Clock Speed

3050 MHz

72%
Turbo Clock Speed

2910 MHz

44%
Base Frequency

1800 MHz

42%
Base Frequency

1700 MHz

  • Architecture 1x 3.05 GHz – Cortex-X3
    3x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-A715
    4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A510
     1x 2.91 GHz – Cortex-X3
    4x 2.37 GHz – Cortex-A715
    4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A510
  • Cores 8 9
  • Instruction set ARMv9-A ARMv9-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache 8 MB -
  • Process 4 nm 4 nm
  • Transistor count 17 Billion -
  • TDP - 6 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G715 Immortalis MC11 Mali-G715 MP7
  • Architecture Valhall 3 Valhall 4th gen
  • GPU frequency 981 MHz 890 MHz
  • Execution units 11 7
  • Shading units - 192
  • FLOPS - 2415.8 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 -
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 8533 MHz 4200 MHz
  • Max bandwidth - 64 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 24 GB 16 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
  • Bus 4 x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 690 AI processor Yes
  • Storage type UFS 4.0 UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0
  • Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 3840 x 2160
  • Max camera resolution 1 x 320MP 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
  • Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
  • Video playback 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem 5G R16 modem Exynos 5300i
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • 5G Download Speed 7900 Mbps 7300 Mbps
  • 4G Download Speed - -
  • 5G Upload Speed - 3700 Mbps
  • 4G Upload Speed - -
  • Wi-Fi 7 7
  • Bluetooth 5.3 5.3
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

MediaTek Dimensity 9200

MediaTek Dimensity 9200
CPU
48%
GPU
47%
Memory
100%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%

Google Tensor G3

Google Tensor G3
CPU
43%
GPU
36%
Memory
49%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote