Overview - Dimensity 9200 Vs Dimensity 1050

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 9200 vs Dimensity 1050 SoCs by Mediatek. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Dimensity 9200 58
Dimensity 1050 27
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Dimensity 9200 60
Dimensity 1050 22
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Dimensity 9200 86
Dimensity 1050 79
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Dimensity 9200 68
Dimensity 1050 43
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Dimensity 9200 Dimensity 1050
CPU 275050 137500
GPU 568108 159729
Memory 240410 96303
UX 206002 129591
Total score 1289570 523123
Key Differences

Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 9200

  • Dimensity 9200 has 22.00% higher CPU clock speed than Dimensity 1050 (3050 vs 2500 MHz).
  • Dimensity 9200 has 166.66% higher memory frequency than Dimensity 1050 (8533 vs 3200 MHz).
  • Dimensity 9200 has 33.33% smaller sized transistor than Dimensity 1050 (4 vs 6 nm).
  • Dimensity 9200 has 146.51% better AnTuTu 9 score than Dimensity 1050 (1,290 K vs 523 K).
  • Dimensity 9200 has latest instruction set, hence better than Dimensity 1050.

Pros of Mediatek Dimensity 1050

  • Dimensity 1050 has 1.94% higher GPU clock speed than Dimensity 9200 (1000 vs 981 MHz).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 9200 1540
Dimensity 1050 745

Multi-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 9200 5210
Dimensity 1050 2142

3DMark

Stability 86%

Graphics test 72 FPS
Stability 97%

Graphics test 15 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display 4K @ 60Hz, QHD+ @ 168Hz FHD+ @144 Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution - 2520 x 1080
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR HDR10+ HDR10+ Adaptive, CUVA HDR-vivid, HLG and Dolby Vision
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

81%
Turbo Clock Speed

3050 MHz

66%
Turbo Clock Speed

2500 MHz

82%
Base Frequency

1800 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 1x 3.05 GHz – Cortex-X3
    3x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-A715
    4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A510
    2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A78
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv9-A ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache 8 MB -
  • Process 4 nm 6 nm
  • Transistor count 17 Billion -
  • TDP - -
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G715 Immortalis MC11 Mali-G610 MC3
  • Architecture Valhall 3 Valhall 3
  • GPU frequency 981 MHz 1000 MHz
  • Execution units 11 3
  • Shading units - -
  • FLOPS - -
  • Vulkan version 1.3 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 8533 MHz 3200 MHz
  • Max bandwidth - -
  • Max Size 24 GB 16 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5
  • Bus 4 x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 690 AI processor MediaTek APU 550
  • Storage type UFS 4.0 UFS 2.1, UFS 3.1
  • Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1 x 320MP 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP
  • Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video playback 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem 5G R16 modem -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 18
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • Wi-Fi 7 6
  • Bluetooth 5.3 5.2
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

MediaTek Dimensity 9200

CPU
58%
GPU
60%
Memory
100%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%

Mediatek Dimensity 1050

CPU
27%
GPU
22%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote