Menu

67

Points
MediaTek Dimensity 9200

Dimensity 9200

59

Points
MediaTek Dimensity 9000

Dimensity 9000
Overview - Dimensity 9200 Vs Dimensity 9000

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 9200 vs Dimensity 9000 SoCs by Mediatek. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Dimensity 9200 55
Dimensity 9000 47
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Dimensity 9200 59
Dimensity 9000 45
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Dimensity 9200 86
Dimensity 9000 86
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Dimensity 9200 67
Dimensity 9000 59
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Dimensity 9200 Dimensity 9000
CPU 275050 254411
GPU 568108 384881
Memory 240410 180981
UX 206002 185288
Total score 1289570 1005561
Key Differences

Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 9200

  • Dimensity 9200 has 15.41% higher GPU clock speed than Dimensity 9000 (981 vs 850 MHz).
  • Dimensity 9200 has 127.55% higher memory frequency than Dimensity 9000 (8533 vs 3750 MHz).
  • Dimensity 9200 has 28.24% better AnTuTu 9 score than Dimensity 9000 (1,290 K vs 1,006 K).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 9200 1540
Dimensity 9000 1275

Multi-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 9200 5210
Dimensity 9000 4132

3DMark

62%
Dimensity 9200
Stability 86%

Graphics test 72 FPS
40%
Dimensity 9000
Stability 90%

Graphics test 47 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display 4K @ 60Hz, QHD+ @ 168Hz WQHD+ @144Hz / Full HD+ @180Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution - 3200 x 1440
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR HDR10+ HDR10+
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

75%
Turbo Clock Speed

3050 MHz

75%
Turbo Clock Speed

3050 MHz

44%
Base Frequency

1800 MHz

44%
Base Frequency

1800 MHz

  • Architecture 1x 3.05 GHz – Cortex-X3
    3x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-A715
    4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A510
     1x 3.05 GHz – Cortex-X2
    3x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-A710
    4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A510
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv9-A ARMv9-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - 1 MB
  • L3 cache 8 MB 8 MB
  • Process 4 nm 4 nm
  • Transistor count 17 Billion -
  • TDP - 4 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G715 Immortalis MC11 Mali-G710 MP10
  • Architecture Valhall 3 Valhall 3
  • GPU frequency 981 MHz 850 MHz
  • Execution units 11 10
  • Shading units - 512
  • FLOPS - 1648 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.3 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 8533 MHz 3750 MHz
  • Max bandwidth - 60 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 24 GB 24 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
  • Bus 4 x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 690 AI processor MediaTek APU 590
  • Storage type UFS 4.0 UFS 3.1
  • Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 3200 x 1440
  • Max camera resolution 1 x 320MP 1x 320MP, 3x 32MP
  • Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem 5G R16 modem -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • 5G Download Speed 7900 Mbps 7000 Mbps
  • 4G Download Speed - -
  • 5G Upload Speed - 2500 Mbps
  • 4G Upload Speed - -
  • Wi-Fi 7 6
  • Bluetooth 5.3 5.3
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

MediaTek Dimensity 9200

MediaTek Dimensity 9200
CPU
55%
GPU
59%
Memory
100%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%

MediaTek Dimensity 9000

MediaTek Dimensity 9000
CPU
47%
GPU
45%
Memory
44%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote