Dimensity 9200 Vs Exynos 850
We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 9200 vs Exynos 850 SoCs by Mediatek and Samsung respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.
Review
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Key Differences
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 9200
- Dimensity 9200 has 19.63% higher GPU clock speed than Exynos 850 (981 vs 820 MHz).
- Dimensity 9200 has 357.29% higher memory frequency than Exynos 850 (8533 vs 1866 MHz).
- Dimensity 9200 has 50% smaller sized transistor than Exynos 850 (4 vs 8 nm).
- Dimensity 9200 has 881.25% better AnTuTu 9 score than Exynos 850 (1,290 K vs 131 K).
- Dimensity 9200 has latest instruction set, hence better than Exynos 850.
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarksAnTuTu 9
| CPU | 275050 | 47291 |
| GPU | 568108 | 21386 |
| Memory | 240410 | 40704 |
| UX | 206002 | 22040 |
| Total score | 1289570 | 131421 |
GeekBench 5
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
| Image compression | - | 74.3 Mpixels/s |
| Face detection | - | 10.4 images/s |
| Speech recognition | - | 16.7 words/s |
| Machine learning | - | 12.4 images/s |
| Camera shooting | - | 5.29 images/s |
| HTML 5 | - | 1.38 Mnodes/s |
| SQLite | - | 356.2 Mnodes/s |
3DMark
93%
Dimensity 92004%
Exynos 850Score: 12074
| Stability | 86% | 98% |
| Graphics test | 72 FPS | 3 FPS |
| Score | 12074 | 505 |
Specifications
Full list of technical specifications of MediaTek Dimensity 9200 and Samsung Exynos 850Display
| Max On-Device Display | 4K @ 60Hz, QHD+ @ 168Hz | Full HD+ |
| Max On-Display Resolution | - | 2520 x 1080 |
| Max External Display | - | - |
| HDR | HDR10+ | - |
| Color Depth | - | - |
| Color Gamut | - | - |
CPU
81%
Dimensity 92000%
Exynos 850
Processor Speed (Frequency)
| Architecture |
1x 3.05 GHz – Cortex-X3 3x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-A715 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A510 |
8x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Base Frequency | 1800 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Turbo Frequency | 3050 MHz | - |
| Instruction set | ARMv9-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| L1 cache | - | - |
| L2 cache | - | - |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | - |
| Process | 4 nm | 8 nm |
| Transistor count | 17 Billion | - |
| TDP | - | 3 W |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G715 Immortalis MC11 | Mali-G52 MP1 |
| Architecture | Valhall 3 | Bifrost |
| GPU frequency | 981 MHz | 820 MHz |
| Execution units | 11 | 6 |
| Shading units | - | 96 |
| FLOPS | - | 126 Gigaflops |
| Vulkan version | 1.3 | 1.1 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX version | 12 | 12 |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 8533 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Bus | 4 x 16 Bit | 2x 16 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | - | - |
| Max size | 24 GB | 8 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Neural processor (NPU) | MediaTek APU 690 AI processor | No |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Max display resolution | 2960 x 1440 | 2520 x 1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1 x 320MP | 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP |
| Video capture | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 1K at 60FPS |
| Video playback | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 1080p at 60FPS |
| Video codecs | H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 | H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 |
| Audio codecs | AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC | AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
Connectivity
Download Speed
4G (MB/s)
5G (MB/s)
Upload Speed
4G (MB/s)
5G (MB/s)
| Modem | 5G R16 modem | - |
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 24 | LTE Cat. 13 |
| 5G support | Yes | No |
| Peak Download speed | Up to 7900 Mbps | - |
| Peak Upload speed | - | - |
| Wi-Fi | 7 | 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.1 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo |
Info
| Announced Date | November 2022 | May 2020 |
| Class | Flagship | Low end |
| Model number | - | S5E3830 |
| Official page | Dimensity 9200 official site | Exynos 850 official site |
MediaTek Dimensity 9200
76
Review By TenzysTech
Samsung Exynos 850
21.5
Review By TenzysTech
