78

Points
Mediatek Dimensity 930

78

Points
Apple A14 Bionic
Overview - Dimensity 930 Vs A14 Bionic

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 930 vs A14 Bionic SoCs by Mediatek and Apple respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core and 6-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Dimensity 930 29
A14 Bionic 50
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Dimensity 930 22
A14 Bionic 48
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Dimensity 930 79
A14 Bionic 82
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Dimensity 930 43
A14 Bionic 60
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Dimensity 930 A14 Bionic
CPU 137539 203493
GPU 130844 284242
Memory 97521 131989
UX 140904 131211
Total score 506808 750935
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect Tenzys Tech scores.
Key Differences

Pros of Apple A14 Bionic

  • A14 Bionic has 40.91% higher CPU clock speed than Dimensity 930 (3100 vs 2200 MHz).
  • A14 Bionic has 16.67% smaller sized transistor than Dimensity 930 (5 vs 6 nm).
  • A14 Bionic has 48.17% better AnTuTu 9 score than Dimensity 930 (751 K vs 507 K ).
  • A14 Bionic has latest instruction set, hence better than Dimensity 930.
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 930 780
A14 Bionic 1611

Multi-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 930 2469
A14 Bionic 4209

Image compression

icon
Dimensity 930
A14 Bionic 171.5

Face detection

icon
Dimensity 930
A14 Bionic 33.6

Speech recognition

icon
Dimensity 930
A14 Bionic 94.8

Machine learning

icon
Dimensity 930
A14 Bionic 93.1

Camera shooting

icon
Dimensity 930
A14 Bionic 38.7

HTML 5

icon
Dimensity 930
A14 Bionic 4.5

SQLite

icon
Dimensity 930
A14 Bionic 1060

3DMark

Stability %

Graphics test -
Stability 77%

Graphics test 50 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display Full HD+ @120 Hz Full HD+ (2.7K) @ 60Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution - 2732 x 2048
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR HDR10+ -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

58%
Turbo Clock Speed

2200 MHz

82%
Turbo Clock Speed

3100 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

82%
Base Frequency

1800 MHz

  • Architecture 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A78
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
    2x 3.1 GHz – Firestorm
    4x 1.8 GHz – Icestorm
  • Cores 8 6
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.5-A
  • L1 cache - 128 KB
  • L2 cache - 8 MB
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 6 nm 5 nm
  • Transistor count - 11.8 Billion
  • TDP - 6 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name IMG BXM-8-256 Apple A14 GPU
  • Architecture PowerVR B-Series -
  • GPU frequency - -
  • Execution units - 4
  • Shading units - -
  • FLOPS - 998 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 -
  • OpenCL version 2.0 -
  • DirectX version 12 -
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency - 2133 MHz
  • Max bandwidth - 34.1 Gbit/s
  • Max Size - 6 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
  • Bus Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Yes Neural Engine
  • Storage type UFS 3.1 NVMe
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2732 x 2048
  • Max camera resolution 1x 108MP
  • Video capture 2K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 2K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP9 H.264, H.265, Motion JPEG
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV, AC-3, E-AC-3, AAX, AAX+
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - -
  • 4G support LTE. Cat.24 LTE Cat. 18
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • Wi-Fi 5 6
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.0
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Mediatek Dimensity 930

CPU
29%
GPU
22%
Memory
0%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%

Apple A14 Bionic

CPU
50%
GPU
48%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
82%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote