Overview - Dimensity 930 Vs Snapdragon 765G

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 930 vs Snapdragon 765G SoCs by Mediatek and Qualcomm respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Dimensity 930 29
Snapdragon 765G 21
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Dimensity 930 22
Snapdragon 765G 16
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Dimensity 930 79
Snapdragon 765G 75
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Dimensity 930 43
Snapdragon 765G 37
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Dimensity 930 Snapdragon 765G
CPU 137539 103525
GPU 130844 93952
Memory 97521 65499
UX 140904 63810
Total score 506808 326786
Key Differences

Pros of Mediatek Dimensity 930

  • Dimensity 930 has 14.29% smaller sized transistor than Snapdragon 765G (6 vs 7 nm).
  • Dimensity 930 has 55.09% better AnTuTu 9 score than Snapdragon 765G (507 K vs 327 K).

Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G

  • Snapdragon 765G has 9.09% higher CPU clock speed than Dimensity 930 (2400 vs 2200 MHz).
  • Snapdragon 765G has latest instruction set, hence better than Dimensity 930.
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 930 780
Snapdragon 765G 583

Multi-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 930 2469
Snapdragon 765G 1810

Image compression

icon
Dimensity 930
Snapdragon 765G 91.3

Face detection

icon
Dimensity 930
Snapdragon 765G 11.9

Speech recognition

icon
Dimensity 930
Snapdragon 765G 30.5

Machine learning

icon
Dimensity 930
Snapdragon 765G 30.8

Camera shooting

icon
Dimensity 930
Snapdragon 765G 13.6

HTML 5

icon
Dimensity 930
Snapdragon 765G 1.24

SQLite

icon
Dimensity 930
Snapdragon 765G 517.8

3DMark

Stability %

Graphics test -
Stability 99%

Graphics test 10 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display Full HD+ @120 Hz QHD+ @ 60 Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution - 3200 x 1800
  • Max External Display - 4K Ultra HD @ 60 Hz
  • HDR HDR10+ HDR10+, HDR10
  • Color Depth - Up to 10-bit
  • Color Gamut - Rec. 2020
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

58%
Turbo Clock Speed

2200 MHz

63%
Turbo Clock Speed

2400 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

82%
Base Frequency

1800 MHz

  • Architecture 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A78
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
    1x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 475 Prime (Cortex-A76)
    1x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 475 Gold (Cortex-A76)
    6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 475 Silver (Cortex-A55)
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.3-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 6 nm 7 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP - 5 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name IMG BXM-8-256 Adreno 620
  • Architecture PowerVR B-Series Adreno 600
  • GPU frequency - 750 MHz
  • Execution units - 3
  • Shading units - 192
  • FLOPS - 576 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency - 2133 MHz
  • Max bandwidth - 17 Gbit/s
  • Max Size - 12 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
  • Bus Bit 2x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Yes Hexagon 696
  • Storage type UFS 3.1 eMMC 5.1, UFS 3.0
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 3200 x 1800
  • Max camera resolution 1x 108MP 1x 192MP
  • Video capture 2K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video playback 2K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - X52
  • 4G support LTE. Cat.24 LTE Cat. 18
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • Wi-Fi 5 6
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.0
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Mediatek Dimensity 930

CPU
29%
GPU
22%
Memory
0%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%

Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G

CPU
21%
GPU
16%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
75%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote