Menu

25

Points
MediaTek Helio G37

Helio G37

45

Points
MediaTek Dimensity 8050

Dimensity 8050
Overview - Helio G37 Vs Dimensity 8050

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Helio G37 vs Dimensity 8050 SoCs by Mediatek. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Helio G37 12
Dimensity 8050 32
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Helio G37 7
Dimensity 8050 24
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Helio G37 57
Dimensity 8050 79
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Helio G37 25
Dimensity 8050 45
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Helio G37 Dimensity 8050
CPU 37521 217200
GPU 27112 208098
Memory 33579 138670
UX 40621 138035
Total score 138833 702003
Key Differences

Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 8050

  • Dimensity 8050 has 30.43% higher CPU clock speed than Helio G37 (3000 vs 2300 MHz).
  • Dimensity 8050 has 25.00% higher GPU clock speed than Helio G37 (850 vs 680 MHz).
  • Dimensity 8050 has 33.31% higher memory frequency than Helio G37 (2133 vs 1600 MHz).
  • Dimensity 8050 has 50% smaller sized transistor than Helio G37 (6 vs 12 nm).
  • Dimensity 8050 has 405.65% better AnTuTu 9 score than Helio G37 (702 K vs 139 K ).
  • Dimensity 8050 Support 145.32% higher memory bandwidth than Helio G37 (34.1 vs 13.9 GB/s).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Helio G37 914
Dimensity 8050 964

Multi-Core Score

icon
Helio G37 178
Dimensity 8050 3261

3DMark

0%
Helio G37
Stability %

Graphics test -
23%
Dimensity 8050
Stability 96%

Graphics test 27 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display Full HD+ @90 Hz QHD+ @ 90 Hz, FHD+ @ 168 Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2400 x 1080 2520 x 1080
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR - -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

57%
Turbo Clock Speed

2300 MHz

74%
Turbo Clock Speed

3000 MHz

44%
Base Frequency

1800 MHz

49%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 4x 2.3 GHz – Cortex-A53
    4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53
     1x 3 GHz – Cortex-A78
    3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A78
    4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 12 nm 6 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP 2.2 W -
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name IMG PowerVR GE8320 Mali-G77 MC9
  • Architecture Rogue Valhall
  • GPU frequency 680 MHz 850 MHz
  • Execution units 2 9
  • Shading units 64 144
  • FLOPS 56 Gigaflops 980 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 1.2 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 1600 MHz 2133 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 13.9 Gbit/s 34.1 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 8 GB 16 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
  • Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) No MediaTek APU 570
  • Storage type eMMC 5.1 UFS 3.1
  • Max display resolution 2400 x 1080 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 50MP, 2x 13MP 1x 200MP
  • Video capture 1K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 1080p at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265 H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
  • Audio codecs AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 7 LTE Cat. 19
  • 5G support No Yes
  • 5G Download Speed - 4700 Mbps
  • 4G Download Speed 300 Mbps -
  • 5G Upload Speed - 2500 Mbps
  • 4G Upload Speed 150 Mbps -
  • Wi-Fi 5 6
  • Bluetooth 5.0 5.2
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

MediaTek Helio G37

MediaTek Helio G37
CPU
12%
GPU
7%
Memory
19%
Energy efficiency and battery life
57%

MediaTek Dimensity 8050

MediaTek Dimensity 8050
CPU
32%
GPU
24%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote