Helio G37 Vs Dimensity 8050
We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Helio G37 vs Dimensity 8050 SoCs by Mediatek. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.
Review
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Key Differences
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 8050
- Dimensity 8050 has 30.43% higher CPU clock speed than Helio G37 (3000 vs 2300 MHz).
- Dimensity 8050 has 25.00% higher GPU clock speed than Helio G37 (850 vs 680 MHz).
- Dimensity 8050 has 33.31% higher memory frequency than Helio G37 (2133 vs 1600 MHz).
- Dimensity 8050 has 50% smaller sized transistor than Helio G37 (6 vs 12 nm).
- Dimensity 8050 has 405.65% better AnTuTu 9 score than Helio G37 (702 K vs 139 K ).
- Dimensity 8050 Support 145.32% higher memory bandwidth than Helio G37 (34.1 vs 13.9 GB/s).
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarksAnTuTu 9
| CPU | 37521 | 217200 |
| GPU | 27112 | 208098 |
| Memory | 33579 | 138670 |
| UX | 40621 | 138035 |
| Total score | 138833 | 702003 |
GeekBench 5
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
| Image compression | - | - |
| Face detection | - | - |
| Speech recognition | - | - |
| Machine learning | - | - |
| Camera shooting | - | - |
| HTML 5 | - | - |
| SQLite | - | - |
3DMark
0%
Helio G3735%
Dimensity 8050Score: 4539
| Stability | - | 96% |
| Graphics test | - | 27 FPS |
| Score | - | 4539 |
Specifications
Full list of technical specifications of MediaTek Helio G37 and MediaTek Dimensity 8050Display
| Max On-Device Display | Full HD+ @90 Hz | QHD+ @ 90 Hz, FHD+ @ 168 Hz |
| Max On-Display Resolution | 2400 x 1080 | 2520 x 1080 |
| Max External Display | - | - |
| HDR | - | - |
| Color Depth | - | - |
| Color Gamut | - | - |
CPU
61%
Helio G3779%
Dimensity 8050
Processor Speed (Frequency)
| Architecture |
4x 2.3 GHz – Cortex-A53 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
1x 3 GHz – Cortex-A78 3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A78 4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Base Frequency | 1800 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Turbo Frequency | 2300 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| L1 cache | - | - |
| L2 cache | - | - |
| L3 cache | - | - |
| Process | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| Transistor count | - | - |
| TDP | 2.2 W | - |
Graphics
| GPU name | IMG PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| Architecture | Rogue | Valhall |
| GPU frequency | 680 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Execution units | 2 | 9 |
| Shading units | 64 | 144 |
| FLOPS | 56 Gigaflops | 980 Gigaflops |
| Vulkan version | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenCL version | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| DirectX version | 12 | 12 |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 1600 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Bus | 2x 16 Bit | 4x 16 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | 13.9 Gbit/s | 34.1 Gbit/s |
| Max size | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Neural processor (NPU) | No | MediaTek APU 570 |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Max display resolution | 2400 x 1080 | 2520 x 1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 50MP, 2x 13MP | 1x 200MP |
| Video capture | 1K at 30FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video playback | 1080p at 30FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video codecs | H.264, H.265 | H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 |
| Audio codecs | AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
Connectivity
Download Speed
4G (MB/s)
5G (MB/s)
Upload Speed
4G (MB/s)
5G (MB/s)
| Modem | - | - |
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 7 | LTE Cat. 19 |
| 5G support | No | Yes |
| Peak Download speed | - | Up to 4700 Mbps |
| Peak Upload speed | - | Up to 2500 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 | 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.2 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC |
Info
| Announced Date | June 2020 | May 2023 |
| Class | Low end | Mid range |
| Model number | MT6765H | MT6893 |
| Official page | Helio G37 official site | Dimensity 8050 official site |
MediaTek Helio G37
24.5
Review By TenzysTech
MediaTek Dimensity 8050
37.25
Review By TenzysTech
