Menu

25

Points
MediaTek Helio G37

Helio G37

91

Points
MediaTek Dimensity 9400

Dimensity 9400
Overview - Helio G37 Vs Dimensity 9400

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Helio G37 vs Dimensity 9400 SoCs by Mediatek. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Helio G37 12
Dimensity 9400 91
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Helio G37 7
Dimensity 9400 94
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Helio G37 57
Dimensity 9400 89
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Helio G37 25
Dimensity 9400 91
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Helio G37 Dimensity 9400
CPU 37521 600293
GPU 27112 1194784
Memory 33579 408283
UX 40621 443652
Total score 138833 2647012
Key Differences

Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 9400

  • Dimensity 9400 has 57.83% higher CPU clock speed than Helio G37 (3630 vs 2300 MHz).
  • Dimensity 9400 has 137.06% higher GPU clock speed than Helio G37 (1612 vs 680 MHz).
  • Dimensity 9400 has 233.31% higher memory frequency than Helio G37 (5333 vs 1600 MHz).
  • Dimensity 9400 has 75% smaller sized transistor than Helio G37 (3 vs 12 nm).
  • Dimensity 9400 has 1,806.62% better AnTuTu 9 score than Helio G37 (2,647 K vs 139 K ).
  • Dimensity 9400 has latest instruction set, hence better than Helio G37.
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Helio G37 914
Dimensity 9400 2876

Multi-Core Score

icon
Helio G37 178
Dimensity 9400 8972

3DMark

0%
Helio G37
Stability %

Graphics test -
96%
Dimensity 9400
Stability 18674%

Graphics test 56 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display Full HD+ @90 Hz -
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2400 x 1080 -
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR - -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

57%
Turbo Clock Speed

2300 MHz

90%
Turbo Clock Speed

3630 MHz

44%
Base Frequency

1800 MHz

59%
Base Frequency

2400 MHz

  • Architecture 4x 2.3 GHz – Cortex-A53
    4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53
     1x 3.63 GHz – Cortex-X925
    3x 3.3 GHz – Cortex-X4
    4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A720
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv9.2-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - 12 MB
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 12 nm 3 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP 2.2 W 8.2 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name IMG PowerVR GE8320 Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12
  • Architecture Rogue Valhall 5th gen
  • GPU frequency 680 MHz 1612 MHz
  • Execution units 2 -
  • Shading units 64 192
  • FLOPS 56 Gigaflops 7428 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.3
  • OpenCL version 1.2 3.2
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 1600 MHz 5333 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 13.9 Gbit/s -
  • Max Size 8 GB 24 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5X
  • Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) No MediaTek NPU 890
  • Storage type eMMC 5.1 UFS 4.0
  • Max display resolution 2400 x 1080 3840 x 2160
  • Max camera resolution 1x 50MP, 2x 13MP 1x 320MP
  • Video capture 1K at 30FPS 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
  • Video playback 1080p at 30FPS 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265 H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
  • Audio codecs AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 7 LTE Cat. 24
  • 5G support No Yes
  • 5G Download Speed - -
  • 4G Download Speed 300 Mbps -
  • 5G Upload Speed - -
  • 4G Upload Speed 150 Mbps -
  • Wi-Fi 5 7
  • Bluetooth 5.0 5.4
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

MediaTek Helio G37

MediaTek Helio G37
CPU
12%
GPU
7%
Memory
19%
Energy efficiency and battery life
57%

MediaTek Dimensity 9400

MediaTek Dimensity 9400
CPU
91%
GPU
94%
Memory
62%
Energy efficiency and battery life
89%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote