Helio G85 Vs Dimensity 8020
We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Helio G85 vs Dimensity 8020 SoCs by Mediatek. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.
Review
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Key Differences
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 8020
- Dimensity 8020 has 30% higher CPU clock speed than Helio G85 (2600 vs 2000 MHz).
- Dimensity 8020 has 18.50% higher memory frequency than Helio G85 (2133 vs 1800 MHz).
- Dimensity 8020 has 50% smaller sized transistor than Helio G85 (6 vs 12 nm).
- Dimensity 8020 has 176.27% better AnTuTu 9 score than Helio G85 (687 K vs 249 K ).
- Dimensity 8020 Support 154.29% higher memory bandwidth than Helio G85 (34.1 vs 13.41 GB/s).
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarksAnTuTu 9
| CPU | 67123 | 169130 |
| GPU | 61260 | 238983 |
| Memory | 42828 | 130727 |
| UX | 77565 | 148460 |
| Total score | 248776 | 687300 |
GeekBench 5
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
| Image compression | 81.2 Mpixels/s | - |
| Face detection | 11.9 images/s | - |
| Speech recognition | 24.2 words/s | - |
| Machine learning | 18.1 images/s | - |
| Camera shooting | 9.26 images/s | - |
| HTML 5 | 1.55 Mnodes/s | - |
| SQLite | 413.5 Mnodes/s | - |
3DMark
5%
Helio G8533%
Dimensity 8020Score: 4236
| Stability | - | 99% |
| Graphics test | 4 FPS | 13 FPS |
| Score | 710 | 4236 |
Specifications
Full list of technical specifications of MediaTek Helio G85 and MediaTek Dimensity 8020Display
| Max On-Device Display | - | Full HD+ @144 Hz, QHD+ @90 Hz |
| Max On-Display Resolution | 2520 x 1080 | 2520 x 1080 |
| Max External Display | - | - |
| HDR | - | HDR10+ |
| Color Depth | - | - |
| Color Gamut | - | - |
CPU
53%
Helio G8569%
Dimensity 8020
Processor Speed (Frequency)
| Architecture |
2x 2 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A78 4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Base Frequency | 1800 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Turbo Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2600 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | - |
| L1 cache | - | - |
| L2 cache | - | - |
| L3 cache | - | - |
| Process | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| Transistor count | - | - |
| TDP | 5 W | 4 W |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G52 MP2 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| Architecture | Bifrost 2 | Valhall |
| GPU frequency | 1000 MHz | - |
| Execution units | 2 | 9 |
| Shading units | 32 | 144 |
| FLOPS | 59 Gigaflops | - |
| Vulkan version | 1.0 | 1.1 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX version | 12 | 12 |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 1800 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Bus | 2x 16 Bit | 4x 16 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | 13.41 Gbit/s | 34.1 Gbit/s |
| Max size | 8 GB | 12 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Neural processor (NPU) | Neural Engine | MediaTek APU 570 |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Max display resolution | 2520 x 1080 | 2520 x 1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP | 1x 108MP |
| Video capture | 2K at 30FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video playback | 2K at 30FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video codecs | H.264, H.265, VP9 | H.264, H.265, VP9 |
| Audio codecs | AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC |
Connectivity
Download Speed
4G (MB/s)
5G (MB/s)
Upload Speed
4G (MB/s)
5G (MB/s)
| Modem | - | - |
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 7 | LTE Cat. 21 |
| 5G support | No | Yes |
| Peak Download speed | - | Up to 4700 Mbps |
| Peak Upload speed | - | Up to 2500 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 | 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.2 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC |
Info
| Announced Date | April 2020 | April 2023 |
| Class | Mid range | Mid range |
| Model number | MT6769Z | - |
| Official page | Helio G85 official site | Dimensity 8020 official site |
MediaTek Helio G85
25.5
Review By TenzysTech
MediaTek Dimensity 8020
36.25
Review By TenzysTech
