78

Points
MediaTek Helio G85

78

Points
Samsung Exynos 2400
Overview - Helio G85 Vs Exynos 2400

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Helio G85 vs Exynos 2400 SoCs by Mediatek and Samsung respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core and 10-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Helio G85 14
Exynos 2400 88
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Helio G85 10
Exynos 2400 76
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Helio G85 57
Exynos 2400 86
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Helio G85 27
Exynos 2400 83
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Helio G85 Exynos 2400
CPU 67123 510545
GPU 61260 587630
Memory 42828 322132
UX 77565 260123
Total score 248776 1680430
Key Differences

Pros of Samsung Exynos 2400

  • Exynos 2400 has 60.5% higher CPU clock speed than Helio G85 (3210 vs 2000 MHz).
  • Exynos 2400 has 0.90% higher GPU clock speed than Helio G85 (1009 vs 1000 MHz).
  • Exynos 2400 has 133.33% higher memory frequency than Helio G85 (4200 vs 1800 MHz).
  • Exynos 2400 has 66.67% smaller sized transistor than Helio G85 (4 vs 12 nm).
  • Exynos 2400 has 575.48% better AnTuTu 9 score than Helio G85 (1,680 K vs 249 K ).
  • Exynos 2400 has latest instruction set, hence better than Helio G85.
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Helio G85 361
Exynos 2400 2193

Multi-Core Score

icon
Helio G85 1279
Exynos 2400 6895

Image compression

icon
Helio G85 81.2
Exynos 2400

Face detection

icon
Helio G85 11.9
Exynos 2400

Speech recognition

icon
Helio G85 24.2
Exynos 2400

Machine learning

icon
Helio G85 18.1
Exynos 2400

Camera shooting

icon
Helio G85 9.26
Exynos 2400

HTML 5

icon
Helio G85 1.55
Exynos 2400

SQLite

icon
Helio G85 413.5
Exynos 2400

3DMark

Stability %

Graphics test 4 FPS
Stability %

Graphics test -
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display - -
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2520 x 1080 -
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR - -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

53%
Turbo Clock Speed

2000 MHz

85%
Turbo Clock Speed

3210 MHz

82%
Base Frequency

1800 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 2x 2 GHz – Cortex-A75
    6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55
    1x 3.21 GHz – Cortex-X4
    2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
    3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
    4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A520
  • Cores 8 10
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv9.2-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 12 nm 4 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP 5 W -
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G52 MP2 Samsung Xclipse 940
  • Architecture Bifrost 2 Samsung Xclipse
  • GPU frequency 1000 MHz 1009 MHz
  • Execution units 2 -
  • Shading units 32 -
  • FLOPS 59 Gigaflops -
  • Vulkan version 1.0 -
  • OpenCL version 2.0 -
  • DirectX version 12 -
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 1800 MHz 4200 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 13.41 Gbit/s -
  • Max Size 8 GB 24 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5X
  • Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Neural Engine Yes
  • Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 UFS 4.0
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 3840 x 2400
  • Max camera resolution 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP 1x 320MP
  • Video capture 2K at 30FPS 8K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 2K at 30FPS 8K at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP9 H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
  • Audio codecs AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - Exynos 5300
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 7 LTE Cat. 24
  • 5G support No Yes
  • Wi-Fi 5 7
  • Bluetooth 5.0 5.4
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

MediaTek Helio G85

CPU
14%
GPU
10%
Memory
21%
Energy efficiency and battery life
57%

Samsung Exynos 2400

CPU
88%
GPU
76%
Memory
49%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote