78

Points
Mediatek Helio G95

78

Points
Apple A17 Pro
Overview - Helio G95 Vs A17 Pro

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Helio G95 vs A17 Pro SoCs by Mediatek and Apple respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core and 6-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Helio G95 19
A17 Pro 94
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Helio G95 14
A17 Pro 95
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Helio G95 57
A17 Pro 89
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Helio G95 30
A17 Pro 93
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Helio G95 A17 Pro
CPU 91718 399992
GPU 91234 620081
Memory 58340 265579
UX 59442 346005
Total score 300734 1631657
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect Tenzys Tech scores.
Key Differences

Pros of Apple A17 Pro

  • A17 Pro has 84.39% higher CPU clock speed than Helio G95 (3780 vs 2050 MHz).
  • A17 Pro has 55.33% higher GPU clock speed than Helio G95 (1398 vs 900 MHz).
  • A17 Pro has 50.02% higher memory frequency than Helio G95 (3200 vs 2133 MHz).
  • A17 Pro has 75% smaller sized transistor than Helio G95 (3 vs 12 nm).
  • A17 Pro has 442.56% better AnTuTu 9 score than Helio G95 (1,632 K vs 301 K ).
  • A17 Pro has latest instruction set, hence better than Helio G95.
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Helio G95 529
A17 Pro 2999

Multi-Core Score

icon
Helio G95 1680
A17 Pro 7779

Image compression

icon
Helio G95 96.2
A17 Pro

Face detection

icon
Helio G95 14.6
A17 Pro

Speech recognition

icon
Helio G95 31.1
A17 Pro

Machine learning

icon
Helio G95 26.4
A17 Pro

Camera shooting

icon
Helio G95 13.8
A17 Pro

HTML 5

icon
Helio G95 1.97
A17 Pro

SQLite

icon
Helio G95 444.9
A17 Pro

3DMark

Stability 98%

Graphics test 8 FPS
Stability 79%

Graphics test 60 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display Full HD+ @ 90Hz -
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2520 x 1080 -
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR HDR10+ -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

54%
Turbo Clock Speed

2050 MHz

100%
Turbo Clock Speed

3780 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

92%
Base Frequency

2020 MHz

  • Architecture 2x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A76
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
    2x 3.78 GHz
    4x 2.02 GHz
  • Cores 8 6
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv9-A
  • L1 cache - 256 KB
  • L2 cache - 16 MB
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 12 nm 3 nm
  • Transistor count - 19 Billion
  • TDP 5 W 8 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G76 3EEMC4 Apple A17 GPU
  • Architecture Bifrost Apple GPU
  • GPU frequency 900 MHz 1398 MHz
  • Execution units 4 6
  • Shading units 64 128
  • FLOPS 195.8 Gigaflops 2147.2 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 -
  • OpenCL version 2.0 -
  • DirectX version 12 -
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 2133 MHz 3200 MHz
  • Max bandwidth - 51.2 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 10 GB 8 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5
  • Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Da Vinci Neural Engine
  • Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 NVMe
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 64MP, 2x 24MP
  • Video capture 4K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9, Motion JPEG
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 12 -
  • 5G support No Yes
  • Wi-Fi 5 6
  • Bluetooth 5.0 5.3
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Mediatek Helio G95

CPU
19%
GPU
14%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
57%

Apple A17 Pro

CPU
94%
GPU
95%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
89%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote