Menu

78

Points
Mediatek Helio G95

Helio G95

78

Points
MediaTek Dimensity 8020

Dimensity 8020
Overview - Helio G95 Vs Dimensity 8020

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Helio G95 vs Dimensity 8020 SoCs by Mediatek. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Helio G95 19
Dimensity 8020 35
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Helio G95 14
Dimensity 8020 31
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Helio G95 57
Dimensity 8020 79
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Helio G95 30
Dimensity 8020 48
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Helio G95 Dimensity 8020
CPU 91718 169130
GPU 91234 238983
Memory 58340 130727
UX 59442 148460
Total score 300734 687300
Key Differences

Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 8020

  • Dimensity 8020 has 26.83% higher CPU clock speed than Helio G95 (2600 vs 2050 MHz).
  • Dimensity 8020 has 50% smaller sized transistor than Helio G95 (6 vs 12 nm).
  • Dimensity 8020 has 128.54% better AnTuTu 9 score than Helio G95 (687 K vs 301 K ).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Helio G95 529
Dimensity 8020 826

Multi-Core Score

icon
Helio G95 1680
Dimensity 8020 3315

Image compression

icon
Helio G95 96.2
Dimensity 8020

Face detection

icon
Helio G95 14.6
Dimensity 8020

Speech recognition

icon
Helio G95 31.1
Dimensity 8020

Machine learning

icon
Helio G95 26.4
Dimensity 8020

Camera shooting

icon
Helio G95 13.8
Dimensity 8020

HTML 5

icon
Helio G95 1.97
Dimensity 8020

SQLite

icon
Helio G95 444.9
Dimensity 8020

3DMark

7%
Helio G95
Stability 98%

Graphics test 8 FPS
22%
Dimensity 8020
Stability 99%

Graphics test 13 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display Full HD+ @ 90Hz Full HD+ @144 Hz, QHD+ @90 Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR HDR10+ HDR10+
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

54%
Turbo Clock Speed

2050 MHz

69%
Turbo Clock Speed

2600 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 2x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A76
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
     4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A78
    4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A -
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 12 nm 6 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP 5 W 4 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G76 3EEMC4 Mali-G77 MC9
  • Architecture Bifrost Valhall
  • GPU frequency 900 MHz -
  • Execution units 4 9
  • Shading units 64 144
  • FLOPS 195.8 Gigaflops -
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
  • Max bandwidth - 34.1 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 10 GB 12 GB
  • Memory type LPDDRLPDDR4X LPDDR4X
  • Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Da Vinci MediaTek APU 570
  • Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 UFS 3.1
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 64MP, 2x 24MP 1x 108MP
  • Video capture 4K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 12 LTE Cat. 21
  • 5G support No Yes
  • Wi-Fi 5 6
  • Bluetooth 5.0 5.2
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Mediatek Helio G95

Mediatek Helio G95
CPU
19%
GPU
14%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
57%

MediaTek Dimensity 8020

MediaTek Dimensity 8020
CPU
35%
GPU
31%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote