78

Points
Mediatek Helio G95
Overview - Helio G95 Vs Dimensity 8050

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Helio G95 vs Dimensity 8050 SoCs by Mediatek. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Helio G95 19
Dimensity 8050 39
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Helio G95 14
Dimensity 8050 31
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Helio G95 57
Dimensity 8050 79
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Helio G95 30
Dimensity 8050 50
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Helio G95 Dimensity 8050
CPU 91718 217200
GPU 91234 208098
Memory 58340 138670
UX 59442 138035
Total score 300734 702003
Key Differences

Pros of Mediatek Helio G95

  • Helio G95 has 5.88% higher GPU clock speed than Dimensity 8050 (900 vs 850 MHz).

Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 8050

  • Dimensity 8050 has 46.34% higher CPU clock speed than Helio G95 (3000 vs 2050 MHz).
  • Dimensity 8050 has 50% smaller sized transistor than Helio G95 (6 vs 12 nm).
  • Dimensity 8050 has 133.43% better AnTuTu 9 score than Helio G95 (702 K vs 301 K ).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Helio G95 529
Dimensity 8050 964

Multi-Core Score

icon
Helio G95 1680
Dimensity 8050 3261

Image compression

icon
Helio G95 96.2
Dimensity 8050

Face detection

icon
Helio G95 14.6
Dimensity 8050

Speech recognition

icon
Helio G95 31.1
Dimensity 8050

Machine learning

icon
Helio G95 26.4
Dimensity 8050

Camera shooting

icon
Helio G95 13.8
Dimensity 8050

HTML 5

icon
Helio G95 1.97
Dimensity 8050

SQLite

icon
Helio G95 444.9
Dimensity 8050

3DMark

Stability 98%

Graphics test 8 FPS
Stability 96%

Graphics test 27 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display Full HD+ @ 90Hz QHD+ @ 90 Hz, FHD+ @ 168 Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR HDR10+ -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

54%
Turbo Clock Speed

2050 MHz

79%
Turbo Clock Speed

3000 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 2x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A76
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
    1x 3 GHz – Cortex-A78
    3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A78
    4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 12 nm 6 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP 5 W -
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G76 3EEMC4 Mali-G77 MC9
  • Architecture Bifrost Valhall
  • GPU frequency 900 MHz 850 MHz
  • Execution units 4 9
  • Shading units 64 144
  • FLOPS 195.8 Gigaflops 980 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
  • Max bandwidth - 34.1 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 10 GB 16 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
  • Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Da Vinci MediaTek APU 570
  • Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 UFS 3.1
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 64MP, 2x 24MP 1x 200MP
  • Video capture 4K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP9 H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 12 LTE Cat. 19
  • 5G support No Yes
  • Wi-Fi 5 6
  • Bluetooth 5.0 5.2
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Mediatek Helio G95

CPU
19%
GPU
14%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
57%

MediaTek Dimensity 8050

CPU
39%
GPU
31%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote