We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released
Helio G95 vs Exynos 2400 SoCs by
Mediatek and Samsung
respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these
8-core
and 10-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and
3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.
Features
Review
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Helio G9516
Exynos 240072
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Helio G9512
Exynos 240060
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Helio G9557
Exynos 240086
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Helio G9528
Exynos 240073
SoC
Helio G95
VS
Exynos 2400
Benchmarks
AnTuTu 9
Helio G95
Exynos 2400
CPU
91718
510545
GPU
91234
587630
Memory
58340
322132
UX
59442
260123
Total score
300734
1680430
Key Differences
Pros of Samsung Exynos 2400
Exynos 2400 has
56.59%
higher CPU clock speed than
Helio G95 (3210 vs
2050 MHz).
Exynos 2400 has
12.11%
higher GPU clock speed than
Helio G95 (1009 vs
900 MHz).
Exynos 2400 has
96.91%
higher memory frequency than
Helio G95 (4200 vs
2133 MHz).
Exynos 2400 has
66.67%
smaller sized transistor than
Helio G95 (4 vs
12 nm).
Exynos 2400 has
458.78%
better AnTuTu 9 score than
Helio G95 (1,680 K vs
301 K ).
Exynos 2400 has latest
instruction set,
hence better than
Helio G95.