Helio G95 Vs Tiger T612
We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Helio G95 vs Tiger T612 SoCs by Mediatek and Unisoc respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.
Review
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Key Differences
Pros of Mediatek Helio G95
- Helio G95 has 13.89% higher CPU clock speed than Tiger T612 (2050 vs 1800 MHz).
- Helio G95 has 38.46% higher GPU clock speed than Tiger T612 (900 vs 650 MHz).
- Helio G95 has 33.31% higher memory frequency than Tiger T612 (2133 vs 1600 MHz).
- Helio G95 has 43.30% better AnTuTu 9 score than Tiger T612 (301 K vs 210 K).
- Helio G95 Support 100.00% higher memory bandwidth than Tiger T612 (600 vs 300 MHz).
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarksAnTuTu 9
| CPU | 91718 | 67603 |
| GPU | 91234 | 22171 |
| Memory | 58340 | 61955 |
| UX | 59442 | 58129 |
| Total score | 300734 | 209858 |
GeekBench 5
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
| Image compression | 96.2 Mpixels/s | - |
| Face detection | 14.6 images/s | - |
| Speech recognition | 31.1 words/s | - |
| Machine learning | 26.4 images/s | - |
| Camera shooting | 13.8 images/s | - |
| HTML 5 | 1.97 Mnodes/s | - |
| SQLite | 444.9 Mnodes/s | - |
3DMark
11%
Helio G953%
Tiger T612Score: 1464
| Stability | 98% | 97% |
| Graphics test | 8 FPS | 2 FPS |
| Score | 1464 | 413 |
Specifications
Full list of technical specifications of Mediatek Helio G95 and Unisoc Tiger T612Display
| Max On-Device Display | Full HD+ @ 90Hz | FHD+ @ 60Hz, HD+ @ 90 Hz |
| Max On-Display Resolution | 2520 x 1080 | 2160 x 1080 |
| Max External Display | - | - |
| HDR | HDR10+ | - |
| Color Depth | - | - |
| Color Gamut | - | - |
CPU
54%
Helio G9548%
Tiger T612
Processor Speed (Frequency)
| Architecture |
2x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Base Frequency | 2000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Turbo Frequency | 2050 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| L1 cache | - | - |
| L2 cache | - | - |
| L3 cache | - | - |
| Process | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Transistor count | - | - |
| TDP | 5 W | - |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G76 3EEMC4 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| Architecture | Bifrost | Valhall |
| GPU frequency | 900 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Execution units | 4 | 1 |
| Shading units | 64 | - |
| FLOPS | 195.8 Gigaflops | - |
| Vulkan version | 1.1 | 1.0 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX version | 12 | 11 |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDRLPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Bus | 2x 16 Bit | 2x 32 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | - | - |
| Max size | 10 GB | 8 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Neural processor (NPU) | Da Vinci | |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2 |
| Max display resolution | 2520 x 1080 | 2160 x 1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 2x 24MP | 1x 50MP |
| Video capture | 4K at 30FPS | 1K at 30FPS |
| Video playback | 4K at 30FPS | 1080p at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | H.264, H.265, VP9 | H.264, H.265 |
| Audio codecs | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
Connectivity
Download Speed
4G (MB/s)
5G (MB/s)
Upload Speed
4G (MB/s)
5G (MB/s)
| Modem | - | - |
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 12 | LTE Cat. 7 |
| 5G support | No | No |
| Peak Download speed | - | - |
| Peak Upload speed | - | - |
| Wi-Fi | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo |
Info
| Announced Date | September 2020 | May 2022 |
| Class | Mid range | Low end |
| Model number | MT6785V/CD | - |
| Official page | Helio G95 official site | Tiger T612 official site |
Mediatek Helio G95
28.75
Review By TenzysTech
Unisoc Tiger T612
19.75
Review By TenzysTech
