78

Points
Mediatek Helio G95

78

Points
Unisoc Tiger T700
Overview - Helio G95 Vs Tiger T700

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Helio G95 vs Tiger T700 SoCs by Mediatek and Unisoc respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Helio G95 19
Tiger T700 14
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Helio G95 14
Tiger T700 9
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Helio G95 57
Tiger T700 57
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Helio G95 30
Tiger T700 27
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Helio G95 Tiger T700
CPU 91718 67140
GPU 91234 43026
Memory 58340 44785
UX 59442 58416
Total score 300734 213367
Key Differences

Pros of Mediatek Helio G95

  • Helio G95 has 12.64% higher CPU clock speed than Tiger T700 (2050 vs 1820 MHz).
  • Helio G95 has 5.88% higher GPU clock speed than Tiger T700 (900 vs 850 MHz).
  • Helio G95 has 14.31% higher memory frequency than Tiger T700 (2133 vs 1866 MHz).
  • Helio G95 has 40.95% better AnTuTu 9 score than Tiger T700 (301 K vs 213 K).
  • Helio G95 Support 100.00% higher memory bandwidth than Tiger T700 (600 vs 300 MHz).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Helio G95 529
Tiger T700 355

Multi-Core Score

icon
Helio G95 1680
Tiger T700 1349

Image compression

icon
Helio G95 96.2
Tiger T700 83.2

Face detection

icon
Helio G95 14.6
Tiger T700 9.85

Speech recognition

icon
Helio G95 31.1
Tiger T700 23.9

Machine learning

icon
Helio G95 26.4
Tiger T700 18.5

Camera shooting

icon
Helio G95 13.8
Tiger T700 9.6

HTML 5

icon
Helio G95 1.97
Tiger T700 1.37

SQLite

icon
Helio G95 444.9
Tiger T700 421.8

3DMark

Stability 98%

Graphics test 8 FPS
Stability %

Graphics test -
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display Full HD+ @ 90Hz Full HD+ @ 90Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2520 x 1080 2160 x 1080
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR HDR10+ -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

54%
Turbo Clock Speed

2050 MHz

48%
Turbo Clock Speed

1820 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

83%
Base Frequency

1820 MHz

  • Architecture 2x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A76
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
    2x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A75
    6x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 12 nm 12 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP 5 W -
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G76 3EEMC4 Mali-G52 MC2
  • Architecture Bifrost Bifrost 2
  • GPU frequency 900 MHz 850 MHz
  • Execution units 4 2
  • Shading units 64 32
  • FLOPS 195.8 Gigaflops 54.4 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.0
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 11
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 2133 MHz 1866 MHz
  • Max bandwidth - -
  • Max Size 10 GB 6 GB
  • Memory type LPDDRLPDDR4X LPDDR4X
  • Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Da Vinci Yes
  • Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2160 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 64MP, 2x 24MP 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP
  • Video capture 4K at 30FPS 1K at 30FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 30FPS 1080p at 30FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - LTE Cat. 7
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 12 No
  • 5G support No -
  • Wi-Fi 5 5
  • Bluetooth 5.0 5.0
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Mediatek Helio G95

CPU
19%
GPU
14%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
57%

Unisoc Tiger T700

CPU
14%
GPU
9%
Memory
22%
Energy efficiency and battery life
57%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote