Menu

78

Points
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus

Snapdragon 480 Plus

78

Points
Apple A17 Pro

A17 Pro
Overview - Snapdragon 480 Plus Vs A17 Pro

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Snapdragon 480 Plus vs A17 Pro SoCs by Qualcomm and Apple respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core and 6-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Snapdragon 480 Plus 20
A17 Pro 94
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Snapdragon 480 Plus 15
A17 Pro 95
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Snapdragon 480 Plus 71
A17 Pro 89
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Snapdragon 480 Plus 35
A17 Pro 93
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Snapdragon 480 Plus A17 Pro
CPU 103367 399992
GPU 83956 620081
Memory 61234 265579
UX 96732 346005
Total score 345289 1631657
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect Tenzys Tech scores.
Key Differences

Pros of Apple A17 Pro

  • A17 Pro has 71.82% higher CPU clock speed than Snapdragon 480 Plus (3780 vs 2200 MHz).
  • A17 Pro has 69.45% higher GPU clock speed than Snapdragon 480 Plus (1398 vs 825 MHz).
  • A17 Pro has 50.02% higher memory frequency than Snapdragon 480 Plus (3200 vs 2133 MHz).
  • A17 Pro has 62.5% smaller sized transistor than Snapdragon 480 Plus (3 vs 8 nm).
  • A17 Pro has 372.55% better AnTuTu 9 score than Snapdragon 480 Plus (1,632 K vs 345 K ).
  • A17 Pro Support 201.18% higher memory bandwidth than Snapdragon 480 Plus (51.2 vs 17 GB/s).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Snapdragon 480 Plus 505
A17 Pro 2999

Multi-Core Score

icon
Snapdragon 480 Plus 1637
A17 Pro 7779

3DMark

5%
Snapdragon 480 Plus
Stability %

Graphics test 5 FPS
51%
A17 Pro
Stability 79%

Graphics test 60 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display FHD+ @ 120 Hz, HD+ @ 120 Hz -
  • Max On-Display Resolution 900 × 1600, 1080 × 2520 -
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR - -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

58%
Turbo Clock Speed

2200 MHz

100%
Turbo Clock Speed

3780 MHz

82%
Base Frequency

1800 MHz

92%
Base Frequency

2020 MHz

  • Architecture 2x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 460 Gold (Cortex-A76)
    6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 460 Silver (Cortex-A55)
     2x 3.78 GHz
    4x 2.02 GHz
  • Cores 8 6
  • Instruction set - ARMv9-A
  • L1 cache - 256 KB
  • L2 cache - 16 MB
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 8 nm 3 nm
  • Transistor count - 19 Billion
  • TDP 3 W 8 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Adreno 619 Apple A17 GPU
  • Architecture Adreno 600 Apple GPU
  • GPU frequency 825 MHz 1398 MHz
  • Execution units 2 6
  • Shading units 128 128
  • FLOPS - 2147.2 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 -
  • OpenCL version 2.0 -
  • DirectX version 12 -
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 2133 MHz 3200 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 17 Gbit/s 51.2 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 8 GB 8 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5
  • Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 686 Neural Engine
  • Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2 NVMe
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 64MP, 2x 25MP
  • Video capture 1K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 1080p at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9, Motion JPEG
  • Audio codecs AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem Snapdragon X51 -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 18 -
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • Wi-Fi 5 6
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.3
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus

Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus
CPU
20%
GPU
15%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
71%

Apple A17 Pro

Apple A17 Pro
CPU
94%
GPU
95%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
89%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote