Menu

78

Points
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus

Snapdragon 480 Plus

78

Points
MediaTek Dimensity 7020

Dimensity 7020
Overview - Snapdragon 480 Plus Vs Dimensity 7020

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Snapdragon 480 Plus vs Dimensity 7020 SoCs by Qualcomm and Mediatek respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Snapdragon 480 Plus 20
Dimensity 7020 30
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Snapdragon 480 Plus 15
Dimensity 7020 19
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Snapdragon 480 Plus 71
Dimensity 7020 79
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Snapdragon 480 Plus 35
Dimensity 7020 43
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Snapdragon 480 Plus Dimensity 7020
CPU 103367 152839
GPU 83956 81155
Memory 61234 118550
UX 96732 124104
Total score 345289 476648
Key Differences

Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 7020

  • Dimensity 7020 has 9.09% higher GPU clock speed than Snapdragon 480 Plus (900 vs 825 MHz).
  • Dimensity 7020 has 50.02% higher memory frequency than Snapdragon 480 Plus (3200 vs 2133 MHz).
  • Dimensity 7020 has 25% smaller sized transistor than Snapdragon 480 Plus (6 vs 8 nm).
  • Dimensity 7020 has 38.04% better AnTuTu 9 score than Snapdragon 480 Plus (477 K vs 345 K ).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Snapdragon 480 Plus 505
Dimensity 7020 897

Multi-Core Score

icon
Snapdragon 480 Plus 1637
Dimensity 7020 2282

3DMark

5%
Snapdragon 480 Plus
Stability %

Graphics test 5 FPS
N/A
Dimensity 7020
Stability %

Graphics test -
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display FHD+ @ 120 Hz, HD+ @ 120 Hz Full HD+@120Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 900 × 1600, 1080 × 2520 2520 x 1080
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR - HDR10+
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

58%
Turbo Clock Speed

2200 MHz

58%
Turbo Clock Speed

2200 MHz

82%
Base Frequency

1800 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 2x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 460 Gold (Cortex-A76)
    6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 460 Silver (Cortex-A55)
     2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A78
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set - ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 8 nm 6 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP 3 W -
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Adreno 619 IMG BXM-8-256
  • Architecture Adreno 600 PowerVR IMG GPU
  • GPU frequency 825 MHz 900 MHz
  • Execution units 2 8
  • Shading units 128 18
  • FLOPS - 259.2 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.3
  • OpenCL version 2.0 3.0
  • DirectX version 12 -
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 2133 MHz 3200 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 17 Gbit/s -
  • Max Size 8 GB 16 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5
  • Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 686 Yes
  • Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2 UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1 (Dual lane)
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 64MP, 2x 25MP 1x 108MP
  • Video capture 1K at 60FPS 2K at 30FPS
  • Video playback 1080p at 60FPS 2K at 30FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP9
  • Audio codecs AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem Snapdragon X51 -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 18
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • Wi-Fi 5 5
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.2
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus

Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus
CPU
20%
GPU
15%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
71%

MediaTek Dimensity 7020

MediaTek Dimensity 7020
CPU
30%
GPU
19%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote