Overview - Snapdragon 480 Plus Vs Exynos 1380

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Snapdragon 480 Plus vs Exynos 1380 SoCs by Qualcomm and Samsung respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Snapdragon 480 Plus 20
Exynos 1380 30
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Snapdragon 480 Plus 15
Exynos 1380 22
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Snapdragon 480 Plus 71
Exynos 1380 82
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Snapdragon 480 Plus 35
Exynos 1380 45
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Key Differences

Pros of Samsung Exynos 1380

  • Exynos 1380 has 9.09% higher CPU clock speed than Snapdragon 480 Plus (2400 vs 2200 MHz).
  • Exynos 1380 has 15.15% higher GPU clock speed than Snapdragon 480 Plus (950 vs 825 MHz).
  • Exynos 1380 has 50.02% higher memory frequency than Snapdragon 480 Plus (3200 vs 2133 MHz).
  • Exynos 1380 has 37.5% smaller sized transistor than Snapdragon 480 Plus (5 vs 8 nm).
  • Exynos 1380 has 51.43% better AnTuTu 9 score than Snapdragon 480 Plus (523 K vs 345 K ).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Snapdragon 480 Plus 505
Exynos 1380 761

Multi-Core Score

icon
Snapdragon 480 Plus 1637
Exynos 1380 2696

3DMark

Stability %

Graphics test 5 FPS
Stability %

Graphics test -
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display FHD+ @ 120 Hz, HD+ @ 120 Hz FHD+ @ 144 Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 900 × 1600, 1080 × 2520 2960 x 1440
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR - -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

58%
Turbo Clock Speed

2200 MHz

63%
Turbo Clock Speed

2400 MHz

82%
Base Frequency

1800 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 2x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 460 Gold (Cortex-A76)
    6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 460 Silver (Cortex-A55)
    4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78
    4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set - ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 8 nm 5 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP 3 W -
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Adreno 619 Mali-G68 MP5
  • Architecture Adreno 600 Valhall 2
  • GPU frequency 825 MHz 950 MHz
  • Execution units 2 5
  • Shading units 128 -
  • FLOPS - 608 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

memory-frequency

Memory frequency

2133 MHz
memory-frequency

Memory frequency

3200 MHz
memory-frequency

Max bandwidth

17 Gbit/s
memory-frequency

Max bandwidth

-
memory-frequency

Max Size

8 GB
memory-frequency

Max Size

8 GB

  • Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5
  • Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 686 Yes
  • Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2 UFS 3.1
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2960 x 1440
  • Max camera resolution 1x 64MP, 2x 25MP 1x 200MP
  • Video capture 1K at 60FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video playback 1080p at 60FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP8
  • Audio codecs AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

4G Speed
  • 800 Mbps
    Download Speed
  • 210 Mbps
    Upload Speed
  • N/A
    Download Speed
  • N/A
    Upload Speed
5G Speed
  • 2500 Mbps
    Download Speed
  • 1500 Mbps
    Upload Speed
  • 3670 Mbps
    Download Speed
  • 1280 Mbps
    Upload Speed

  • Modem Snapdragon X51 -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 18
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • Wi-Fi 5 6
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.2
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus

CPU
20%
GPU
15%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
71%

Samsung Exynos 1380

CPU
30%
GPU
22%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
82%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote