Menu

78

Points
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus

Snapdragon 480 Plus

78

Points
Samsung Exynos 2400

Exynos 2400
Overview - Snapdragon 480 Plus Vs Exynos 2400

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Snapdragon 480 Plus vs Exynos 2400 SoCs by Qualcomm and Samsung respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core and 10-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Snapdragon 480 Plus 20
Exynos 2400 88
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Snapdragon 480 Plus 15
Exynos 2400 76
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Snapdragon 480 Plus 71
Exynos 2400 86
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Snapdragon 480 Plus 35
Exynos 2400 83
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Snapdragon 480 Plus Exynos 2400
CPU 103367 510545
GPU 83956 587630
Memory 61234 322132
UX 96732 260123
Total score 345289 1680430
Key Differences

Pros of Samsung Exynos 2400

  • Exynos 2400 has 45.91% higher CPU clock speed than Snapdragon 480 Plus (3210 vs 2200 MHz).
  • Exynos 2400 has 22.30% higher GPU clock speed than Snapdragon 480 Plus (1009 vs 825 MHz).
  • Exynos 2400 has 96.91% higher memory frequency than Snapdragon 480 Plus (4200 vs 2133 MHz).
  • Exynos 2400 has 50% smaller sized transistor than Snapdragon 480 Plus (4 vs 8 nm).
  • Exynos 2400 has 386.67% better AnTuTu 9 score than Snapdragon 480 Plus (1,680 K vs 345 K ).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Snapdragon 480 Plus 505
Exynos 2400 2193

Multi-Core Score

icon
Snapdragon 480 Plus 1637
Exynos 2400 6895

3DMark

5%
Snapdragon 480 Plus
Stability %

Graphics test 5 FPS
N/A
Exynos 2400
Stability %

Graphics test -
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display FHD+ @ 120 Hz, HD+ @ 120 Hz -
  • Max On-Display Resolution 900 × 1600, 1080 × 2520 -
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR - -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

58%
Turbo Clock Speed

2200 MHz

85%
Turbo Clock Speed

3210 MHz

82%
Base Frequency

1800 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 2x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 460 Gold (Cortex-A76)
    6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 460 Silver (Cortex-A55)
     1x 3.21 GHz – Cortex-X4
    2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
    3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
    4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A520
  • Cores 8 10
  • Instruction set - ARMv9.2-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 8 nm 4 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP 3 W -
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Adreno 619 Samsung Xclipse 940
  • Architecture Adreno 600 Samsung Xclipse
  • GPU frequency 825 MHz 1009 MHz
  • Execution units 2 -
  • Shading units 128 -
  • FLOPS - -
  • Vulkan version 1.1 -
  • OpenCL version 2.0 -
  • DirectX version 12 -
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 2133 MHz 4200 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 17 Gbit/s -
  • Max Size 8 GB 24 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5X
  • Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 686 Yes
  • Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2 UFS 4.0
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 3840 x 2400
  • Max camera resolution 1x 64MP, 2x 25MP 1x 320MP
  • Video capture 1K at 60FPS 8K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 1080p at 60FPS 8K at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP9 H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
  • Audio codecs AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem Snapdragon X51 Exynos 5300
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 24
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • Wi-Fi 5 7
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.4
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus

Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus
CPU
20%
GPU
15%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
71%

Samsung Exynos 2400

Samsung Exynos 2400
CPU
88%
GPU
76%
Memory
49%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote