Menu

78

Points
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685

Snapdragon 685

78

Points
Mediatek Helio G90T

Helio G90T
Overview - Snapdragon 685 Vs Helio G90T

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Snapdragon 685 vs Helio G90T SoCs by Qualcomm and Mediatek respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Snapdragon 685 17
Helio G90T 20
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Snapdragon 685 11
Helio G90T 14
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Snapdragon 685 79
Helio G90T 57
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Snapdragon 685 36
Helio G90T 30
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Snapdragon 685 Helio G90T
CPU 81894 98285
GPU 39122 80267
Memory 77991 55541
UX 71216 55908
Total score 270223 290001
Key Differences

Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 685

  • Snapdragon 685 has 36.59% higher CPU clock speed than Helio G90T (2800 vs 2050 MHz).
  • Snapdragon 685 has 50% smaller sized transistor than Helio G90T (6 vs 12 nm).

Pros of Mediatek Helio G90T

  • Helio G90T has 7.32% better AnTuTu 9 score than Snapdragon 685 (290 K vs 270 K ).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Snapdragon 685 377
Helio G90T 545

Multi-Core Score

icon
Snapdragon 685 1609
Helio G90T 1706

Image compression

icon
Snapdragon 685
Helio G90T 94.5

Face detection

icon
Snapdragon 685
Helio G90T 13.8

Speech recognition

icon
Snapdragon 685
Helio G90T 31.1

Machine learning

icon
Snapdragon 685
Helio G90T 25.6

Camera shooting

icon
Snapdragon 685
Helio G90T 13.1

HTML 5

icon
Snapdragon 685
Helio G90T 1.89

SQLite

icon
Snapdragon 685
Helio G90T 494.9

3DMark

0%
Snapdragon 685
Stability %

Graphics test -
7%
Helio G90T
Stability 87%

Graphics test 7 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display HD+ @ 120 Hz, FHD+ @ 120 Hz Full HD+
  • Max On-Display Resolution 1080 × 2520 2520 x 1080
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR - -
  • Color Depth Up to 12-bit, Up to 10-bit -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

74%
Turbo Clock Speed

2800 MHz

54%
Turbo Clock Speed

2050 MHz

86%
Base Frequency

1900 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 4x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A73
    4x 1.9 GHz – Cortex-A53
     2x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A76
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 6 nm 12 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP - 5 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Adreno 610 Mali-G76 MC4
  • Architecture Adreno 600 Bifrost
  • GPU frequency - 800 MHz
  • Execution units 2 4
  • Shading units 96 64
  • FLOPS - 184 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 17 Gbit/s -
  • Max Size 8 GB 10 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
  • Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 32 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 686 Yes
  • Storage type UFS 2.2 eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP 1x 64MP, 2x 24MP
  • Video capture 1K at 60FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video playback 1080p at 60FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP9
  • Audio codecs AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem X11 -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 13 LTE Cat. 12
  • 5G support No No
  • Wi-Fi 5 5
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.0
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Qualcomm Snapdragon 685

Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
CPU
17%
GPU
11%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%

Mediatek Helio G90T

Mediatek Helio G90T
CPU
20%
GPU
14%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
57%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote