Menu

78

Points
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685

Snapdragon 685

78

Points
Mediatek Helio G95

Helio G95
Overview - Snapdragon 685 Vs Helio G95

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Snapdragon 685 vs Helio G95 SoCs by Qualcomm and Mediatek respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Snapdragon 685 17
Helio G95 19
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Snapdragon 685 11
Helio G95 14
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Snapdragon 685 79
Helio G95 57
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Snapdragon 685 36
Helio G95 30
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Snapdragon 685 Helio G95
CPU 81894 91718
GPU 39122 91234
Memory 77991 58340
UX 71216 59442
Total score 270223 300734
Key Differences

Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 685

  • Snapdragon 685 has 36.59% higher CPU clock speed than Helio G95 (2800 vs 2050 MHz).
  • Snapdragon 685 has 50% smaller sized transistor than Helio G95 (6 vs 12 nm).

Pros of Mediatek Helio G95

  • Helio G95 has 11.29% better AnTuTu 9 score than Snapdragon 685 (301 K vs 270 K ).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Snapdragon 685 377
Helio G95 529

Multi-Core Score

icon
Snapdragon 685 1609
Helio G95 1680

Image compression

icon
Snapdragon 685
Helio G95 96.2

Face detection

icon
Snapdragon 685
Helio G95 14.6

Speech recognition

icon
Snapdragon 685
Helio G95 31.1

Machine learning

icon
Snapdragon 685
Helio G95 26.4

Camera shooting

icon
Snapdragon 685
Helio G95 13.8

HTML 5

icon
Snapdragon 685
Helio G95 1.97

SQLite

icon
Snapdragon 685
Helio G95 444.9

3DMark

0%
Snapdragon 685
Stability %

Graphics test -
7%
Helio G95
Stability 98%

Graphics test 8 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display HD+ @ 120 Hz, FHD+ @ 120 Hz Full HD+ @ 90Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 1080 × 2520 2520 x 1080
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR - HDR10+
  • Color Depth Up to 12-bit, Up to 10-bit -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

74%
Turbo Clock Speed

2800 MHz

54%
Turbo Clock Speed

2050 MHz

86%
Base Frequency

1900 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 4x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A73
    4x 1.9 GHz – Cortex-A53
     2x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A76
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 6 nm 12 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP - 5 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Adreno 610 Mali-G76 3EEMC4
  • Architecture Adreno 600 Bifrost
  • GPU frequency - 900 MHz
  • Execution units 2 4
  • Shading units 96 64
  • FLOPS - 195.8 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 17 Gbit/s -
  • Max Size 8 GB 10 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDRLPDDR4X
  • Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 686 Da Vinci
  • Storage type UFS 2.2 eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP 1x 64MP, 2x 24MP
  • Video capture 1K at 60FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video playback 1080p at 60FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP9
  • Audio codecs AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem X11 -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 13 LTE Cat. 12
  • 5G support No No
  • Wi-Fi 5 5
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.0
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Qualcomm Snapdragon 685

Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
CPU
17%
GPU
11%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%

Mediatek Helio G95

Mediatek Helio G95
CPU
19%
GPU
14%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
57%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote