Overview - Snapdragon 685 Vs Snapdragon 778G Plus

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Snapdragon 685 vs Snapdragon 778G Plus SoCs by Qualcomm. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Snapdragon 685 17
Snapdragon 778G Plus 33
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Snapdragon 685 11
Snapdragon 778G Plus 26
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Snapdragon 685 79
Snapdragon 778G Plus 79
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Snapdragon 685 36
Snapdragon 778G Plus 46
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Snapdragon 685 Snapdragon 778G Plus
CPU 81894 166382
GPU 39122 177972
Memory 77991 106394
UX 71216 130486
Total score 270223 581234
Key Differences

Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 685

  • Snapdragon 685 has 12.00% higher CPU clock speed than Snapdragon 778G Plus (2800 vs 2500 MHz).

Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus

  • Snapdragon 778G Plus has 50.02% higher memory frequency than Snapdragon 685 (3200 vs 2133 MHz).
  • Snapdragon 778G Plus has 115.09% better AnTuTu 9 score than Snapdragon 685 (581 K vs 270 K ).
  • Snapdragon 778G Plus has latest instruction set, hence better than Snapdragon 685.
  • Snapdragon 778G Plus Support 50.59% higher memory bandwidth than Snapdragon 685 (25.6 vs 17 GB/s).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Snapdragon 685 377
Snapdragon 778G Plus 816

Multi-Core Score

icon
Snapdragon 685 1609
Snapdragon 778G Plus 2971

3DMark

Stability %

Graphics test -
Stability %

Graphics test 16 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display HD+ @ 120 Hz, FHD+ @ 120 Hz FHD+ @ 144 Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 1080 × 2520 2520 x 1080
  • Max External Display - 4K @ 60 Hz
  • HDR - HDR10+, HDR10
  • Color Depth Up to 12-bit, Up to 10-bit Up to 10-bit
  • Color Gamut - Rec. 2020
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

74%
Turbo Clock Speed

2800 MHz

66%
Turbo Clock Speed

2500 MHz

86%
Base Frequency

1900 MHz

86%
Base Frequency

1900 MHz

  • Architecture 4x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A73
    4x 1.9 GHz – Cortex-A53
    1x 2.5 GHz – Kryo 670 Prime (Cortex-A78)
    3x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 670 Gold (Cortex-A78)
    4x 1.9 GHz – Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55)
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.4-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - 2 MB
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 6 nm 6 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP - 5 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Adreno 610 Adreno 642L
  • Architecture Adreno 600 Adreno 600
  • GPU frequency - 550 MHz
  • Execution units 2 2
  • Shading units 96 384
  • FLOPS - 845 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 2133 MHz 3200 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 17 Gbit/s 25.6 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 8 GB 16 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5
  • Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 686 Hexagon 770
  • Storage type UFS 2.2 UFS 2.2, UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP 1x 192MP
  • Video capture 1K at 60FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video playback 1080p at 60FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
  • Audio codecs AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem X11 X53
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 13 LTE Cat. 24
  • 5G support No Yes
  • Wi-Fi 5 6
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.2
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Qualcomm Snapdragon 685

CPU
17%
GPU
11%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%

Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus

CPU
33%
GPU
26%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote