Menu

34

Points
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685

Snapdragon 685

73

Points
Samsung Exynos 2400

Exynos 2400
Overview - Snapdragon 685 Vs Exynos 2400

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Snapdragon 685 vs Exynos 2400 SoCs by Qualcomm and Samsung respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core and 10-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Snapdragon 685 14
Exynos 2400 72
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Snapdragon 685 9
Exynos 2400 60
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Snapdragon 685 79
Exynos 2400 86
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Snapdragon 685 34
Exynos 2400 73
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Snapdragon 685 Exynos 2400
CPU 81894 510545
GPU 39122 587630
Memory 77991 322132
UX 71216 260123
Total score 270223 1680430
Key Differences

Pros of Samsung Exynos 2400

  • Exynos 2400 has 14.64% higher CPU clock speed than Snapdragon 685 (3210 vs 2800 MHz).
  • Exynos 2400 has 96.91% higher memory frequency than Snapdragon 685 (4200 vs 2133 MHz).
  • Exynos 2400 has 33.33% smaller sized transistor than Snapdragon 685 (4 vs 6 nm).
  • Exynos 2400 has 521.87% better AnTuTu 9 score than Snapdragon 685 (1,680 K vs 270 K ).
  • Exynos 2400 has latest instruction set, hence better than Snapdragon 685.
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Snapdragon 685 377
Exynos 2400 2193

Multi-Core Score

icon
Snapdragon 685 1609
Exynos 2400 6895

3DMark

0%
Snapdragon 685
Stability %

Graphics test -
N/A
Exynos 2400
Stability %

Graphics test -
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display HD+ @ 120 Hz, FHD+ @ 120 Hz -
  • Max On-Display Resolution 1080 × 2520 -
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR - -
  • Color Depth Up to 12-bit, Up to 10-bit -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

69%
Turbo Clock Speed

2800 MHz

79%
Turbo Clock Speed

3210 MHz

47%
Base Frequency

1900 MHz

49%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 4x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A73
    4x 1.9 GHz – Cortex-A53
     1x 3.21 GHz – Cortex-X4
    2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
    3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
    4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A520
  • Cores 8 10
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv9.2-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 6 nm 4 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP - -
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Adreno 610 Samsung Xclipse 940
  • Architecture Adreno 600 Samsung Xclipse
  • GPU frequency - 1009 MHz
  • Execution units 2 -
  • Shading units 96 -
  • FLOPS - -
  • Vulkan version 1.1 -
  • OpenCL version 2.0 -
  • DirectX version 12 -
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 2133 MHz 4200 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 17 Gbit/s -
  • Max Size 8 GB 24 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5X
  • Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 686 Yes
  • Storage type UFS 2.2 UFS 4.0
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 3840 x 2400
  • Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP 1x 320MP
  • Video capture 1K at 60FPS 8K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 1080p at 60FPS 8K at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
  • Audio codecs AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem X11 Exynos 5300
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 13 LTE Cat. 24
  • 5G support No Yes
  • 5G Download Speed - 9640 Mbps
  • 4G Download Speed 390 Mbps -
  • 5G Upload Speed - 2550 Mbps
  • 4G Upload Speed 150 Mbps -
  • Wi-Fi 5 7
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.4
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Qualcomm Snapdragon 685

Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
CPU
14%
GPU
9%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%

Samsung Exynos 2400

Samsung Exynos 2400
CPU
72%
GPU
60%
Memory
49%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote