Menu

78

Points
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685

Snapdragon 685

78

Points
Samsung Exynos 850

Exynos 850
Overview - Snapdragon 685 Vs Exynos 850

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Snapdragon 685 vs Exynos 850 SoCs by Qualcomm and Samsung respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Snapdragon 685 17
Exynos 850 9
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Snapdragon 685 11
Exynos 850 6
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Snapdragon 685 79
Exynos 850 71
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Snapdragon 685 36
Exynos 850 29
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Snapdragon 685 Exynos 850
CPU 81894 47291
GPU 39122 21386
Memory 77991 40704
UX 71216 22040
Total score 270223 131421
Key Differences

Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 685

  • Snapdragon 685 has 14.31% higher memory frequency than Exynos 850 (2133 vs 1866 MHz).
  • Snapdragon 685 has 25% smaller sized transistor than Exynos 850 (6 vs 8 nm).
  • Snapdragon 685 has 105.62% better AnTuTu 9 score than Exynos 850 (270 K vs 131 K).
  • Snapdragon 685 Support 30.00% higher memory bandwidth than Exynos 850 (390 vs 300 MHz).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Snapdragon 685 377
Exynos 850 150

Multi-Core Score

icon
Snapdragon 685 1609
Exynos 850 937

Image compression

icon
Snapdragon 685
Exynos 850 74.3

Face detection

icon
Snapdragon 685
Exynos 850 10.4

Speech recognition

icon
Snapdragon 685
Exynos 850 16.7

Machine learning

icon
Snapdragon 685
Exynos 850 12.4

Camera shooting

icon
Snapdragon 685
Exynos 850 5.29

HTML 5

icon
Snapdragon 685
Exynos 850 1.38

SQLite

icon
Snapdragon 685
Exynos 850 356.2

3DMark

0%
Snapdragon 685
Stability %

Graphics test -
3%
Exynos 850
Stability 98%

Graphics test 3 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display HD+ @ 120 Hz, FHD+ @ 120 Hz Full HD+
  • Max On-Display Resolution 1080 × 2520 2520 x 1080
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR - -
  • Color Depth Up to 12-bit, Up to 10-bit -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

74%
Turbo Clock Speed

2800 MHz

0%
Turbo Clock Speed

MHz

86%
Base Frequency

1900 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 4x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A73
    4x 1.9 GHz – Cortex-A53
     8x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 6 nm 8 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP - 3 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Adreno 610 Mali-G52 MP1
  • Architecture Adreno 600 Bifrost
  • GPU frequency - 820 MHz
  • Execution units 2 6
  • Shading units 96 96
  • FLOPS - 126 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 2133 MHz 1866 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 17 Gbit/s -
  • Max Size 8 GB 8 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
  • Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 686 No
  • Storage type UFS 2.2 eMMC 5.1
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP
  • Video capture 1K at 60FPS 1K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 1080p at 60FPS 1080p at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
  • Audio codecs AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem X11 -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 13 LTE Cat. 13
  • 5G support No No
  • Wi-Fi 5 5
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.1
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Qualcomm Snapdragon 685

Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
CPU
17%
GPU
11%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%

Samsung Exynos 850

Samsung Exynos 850
CPU
9%
GPU
6%
Memory
22%
Energy efficiency and battery life
71%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote