78

Points
Unisoc Tiger T700
Overview - Snapdragon 685 Vs Tiger T700

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Snapdragon 685 vs Tiger T700 SoCs by Qualcomm and Unisoc respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Snapdragon 685 17
Tiger T700 14
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Snapdragon 685 11
Tiger T700 9
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Snapdragon 685 79
Tiger T700 57
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Snapdragon 685 36
Tiger T700 27
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Snapdragon 685 Tiger T700
CPU 81894 67140
GPU 39122 43026
Memory 77991 44785
UX 71216 58416
Total score 270223 213367
Key Differences

Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 685

  • Snapdragon 685 has 53.85% higher CPU clock speed than Tiger T700 (2800 vs 1820 MHz).
  • Snapdragon 685 has 14.31% higher memory frequency than Tiger T700 (2133 vs 1866 MHz).
  • Snapdragon 685 has 50% smaller sized transistor than Tiger T700 (6 vs 12 nm).
  • Snapdragon 685 has 26.65% better AnTuTu 9 score than Tiger T700 (270 K vs 213 K).
  • Snapdragon 685 Support 30.00% higher memory bandwidth than Tiger T700 (390 vs 300 MHz).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Snapdragon 685 377
Tiger T700 355

Multi-Core Score

icon
Snapdragon 685 1609
Tiger T700 1349

Image compression

icon
Snapdragon 685
Tiger T700 83.2

Face detection

icon
Snapdragon 685
Tiger T700 9.85

Speech recognition

icon
Snapdragon 685
Tiger T700 23.9

Machine learning

icon
Snapdragon 685
Tiger T700 18.5

Camera shooting

icon
Snapdragon 685
Tiger T700 9.6

HTML 5

icon
Snapdragon 685
Tiger T700 1.37

SQLite

icon
Snapdragon 685
Tiger T700 421.8

3DMark

Stability %

Graphics test -
Stability %

Graphics test -
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display HD+ @ 120 Hz, FHD+ @ 120 Hz Full HD+ @ 90Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 1080 × 2520 2160 x 1080
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR - -
  • Color Depth Up to 12-bit, Up to 10-bit -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

74%
Turbo Clock Speed

2800 MHz

48%
Turbo Clock Speed

1820 MHz

86%
Base Frequency

1900 MHz

83%
Base Frequency

1820 MHz

  • Architecture 4x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A73
    4x 1.9 GHz – Cortex-A53
    2x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A75
    6x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 6 nm 12 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP - -
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Adreno 610 Mali-G52 MC2
  • Architecture Adreno 600 Bifrost 2
  • GPU frequency - 850 MHz
  • Execution units 2 2
  • Shading units 96 32
  • FLOPS - 54.4 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.0
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 11
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 2133 MHz 1866 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 17 Gbit/s -
  • Max Size 8 GB 6 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
  • Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 686 Yes
  • Storage type UFS 2.2 eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2160 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP
  • Video capture 1K at 60FPS 1K at 30FPS
  • Video playback 1080p at 60FPS 1080p at 30FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP9
  • Audio codecs AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem X11 LTE Cat. 7
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 13 No
  • 5G support No -
  • Wi-Fi 5 5
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.0
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Qualcomm Snapdragon 685

CPU
17%
GPU
11%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%

Unisoc Tiger T700

CPU
14%
GPU
9%
Memory
22%
Energy efficiency and battery life
57%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote