Overview - Snapdragon 690 Vs Exynos 1380

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Snapdragon 690 vs Exynos 1380 SoCs by Qualcomm and Samsung respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Snapdragon 690 22
Exynos 1380 30
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Snapdragon 690 15
Exynos 1380 22
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Snapdragon 690 71
Exynos 1380 82
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Snapdragon 690 36
Exynos 1380 45
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Snapdragon 690 Exynos 1380
CPU 110385 151675
GPU 76645 135413
Memory 63724 110932
UX 94636 124860
Total score 345390 522880
Key Differences

Pros of Samsung Exynos 1380

  • Exynos 1380 has 20% higher CPU clock speed than Snapdragon 690 (2400 vs 2000 MHz).
  • Exynos 1380 has 50.02% higher memory frequency than Snapdragon 690 (3200 vs 2133 MHz).
  • Exynos 1380 has 37.5% smaller sized transistor than Snapdragon 690 (5 vs 8 nm).
  • Exynos 1380 has 51.39% better AnTuTu 9 score than Snapdragon 690 (523 K vs 345 K ).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Snapdragon 690 607
Exynos 1380 761

Multi-Core Score

icon
Snapdragon 690 1852
Exynos 1380 2696

Image compression

icon
Snapdragon 690 111.3
Exynos 1380

Face detection

icon
Snapdragon 690 16.9
Exynos 1380

Speech recognition

icon
Snapdragon 690 28.8
Exynos 1380

Machine learning

icon
Snapdragon 690 26.7
Exynos 1380

Camera shooting

icon
Snapdragon 690 15.9
Exynos 1380

HTML 5

icon
Snapdragon 690 2.25
Exynos 1380

SQLite

icon
Snapdragon 690 579.5
Exynos 1380

3DMark

Stability 99%

Graphics test 4 FPS
Stability %

Graphics test -
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display FHD+ @ 120 Hz FHD+ @ 144 Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2520 x 1080 2960 x 1440
  • Max External Display QHD @ 60Hz -
  • HDR HDR10 -
  • Color Depth Up to 10-bit -
  • Color Gamut Rec2020 -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

53%
Turbo Clock Speed

2000 MHz

63%
Turbo Clock Speed

2400 MHz

77%
Base Frequency

1700 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 2x 2 GHz – Kryo 560 Gold (Cortex-A77)
    6x 1.7 GHz – Kryo 560 Silver (Cortex-A55)
    4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78
    4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 8 nm 5 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP 6 W -
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Adreno 619L Mali-G68 MP5
  • Architecture Adreno 600 Valhall 2
  • GPU frequency 950 MHz 950 MHz
  • Execution units 2 5
  • Shading units 128 -
  • FLOPS - 608 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 2133 MHz 3200 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 14.9 Gbit/s -
  • Max Size 8 GB 8 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5
  • Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 692 Yes
  • Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1, UFS 3.0 UFS 3.1
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2960 x 1440
  • Max camera resolution 1x 192MP, 2x 16MP 1x 200MP
  • Video capture 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP8
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem X51 -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 18
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • Wi-Fi 5 6
  • Bluetooth 5.1 5.2
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Qualcomm Snapdragon 690

CPU
22%
GPU
15%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
71%

Samsung Exynos 1380

CPU
30%
GPU
22%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
82%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote