78

Points
Samsung Exynos 850
Overview - Snapdragon 690 Vs Exynos 850

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Snapdragon 690 vs Exynos 850 SoCs by Qualcomm and Samsung respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Snapdragon 690 22
Exynos 850 9
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Snapdragon 690 15
Exynos 850 6
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Snapdragon 690 71
Exynos 850 71
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Snapdragon 690 36
Exynos 850 29
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Snapdragon 690 Exynos 850
CPU 110385 47291
GPU 76645 21386
Memory 63724 40704
UX 94636 22040
Total score 345390 131421
Key Differences

Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 690

  • Snapdragon 690 has 15.85% higher GPU clock speed than Exynos 850 (950 vs 820 MHz).
  • Snapdragon 690 has 14.31% higher memory frequency than Exynos 850 (2133 vs 1866 MHz).
  • Snapdragon 690 has 162.81% better AnTuTu 9 score than Exynos 850 (345 K vs 131 K).
  • Snapdragon 690 Support 300.00% higher memory bandwidth than Exynos 850 (1200 vs 300 MHz).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Snapdragon 690 607
Exynos 850 150

Multi-Core Score

icon
Snapdragon 690 1852
Exynos 850 937

Image compression

icon
Snapdragon 690 111.3
Exynos 850 74.3

Face detection

icon
Snapdragon 690 16.9
Exynos 850 10.4

Speech recognition

icon
Snapdragon 690 28.8
Exynos 850 16.7

Machine learning

icon
Snapdragon 690 26.7
Exynos 850 12.4

Camera shooting

icon
Snapdragon 690 15.9
Exynos 850 5.29

HTML 5

icon
Snapdragon 690 2.25
Exynos 850 1.38

SQLite

icon
Snapdragon 690 579.5
Exynos 850 356.2

3DMark

Stability 99%

Graphics test 4 FPS
Stability 98%

Graphics test 3 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display FHD+ @ 120 Hz Full HD+
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
  • Max External Display QHD @ 60Hz -
  • HDR HDR10 -
  • Color Depth Up to 10-bit -
  • Color Gamut Rec2020 -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

53%
Turbo Clock Speed

2000 MHz

0%
Turbo Clock Speed

MHz

77%
Base Frequency

1700 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 2x 2 GHz – Kryo 560 Gold (Cortex-A77)
    6x 1.7 GHz – Kryo 560 Silver (Cortex-A55)
    8x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 8 nm 8 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP 6 W 3 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Adreno 619L Mali-G52 MP1
  • Architecture Adreno 600 Bifrost
  • GPU frequency 950 MHz 820 MHz
  • Execution units 2 6
  • Shading units 128 96
  • FLOPS - 126 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 2133 MHz 1866 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 14.9 Gbit/s -
  • Max Size 8 GB 8 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
  • Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 692 No
  • Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1, UFS 3.0 eMMC 5.1
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 192MP, 2x 16MP 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP
  • Video capture 4K at 30FPS 1K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 30FPS 1080p at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem X51 -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 13
  • 5G support Yes No
  • Wi-Fi 5 5
  • Bluetooth 5.1 5.1
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Qualcomm Snapdragon 690

CPU
22%
GPU
15%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
71%

Samsung Exynos 850

CPU
9%
GPU
6%
Memory
22%
Energy efficiency and battery life
71%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote