Overview - Snapdragon 695 Vs Dimensity 8020

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Snapdragon 695 vs Dimensity 8020 SoCs by Qualcomm and Mediatek respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Snapdragon 695 23
Dimensity 8020 35
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Snapdragon 695 17
Dimensity 8020 31
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Snapdragon 695 79
Dimensity 8020 79
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Snapdragon 695 40
Dimensity 8020 48
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Snapdragon 695 Dimensity 8020
CPU 115765 169130
GPU 93638 238983
Memory 60715 130727
UX 101282 148460
Total score 371400 687300
Key Differences

Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 8020

  • Dimensity 8020 has 18.18% higher CPU clock speed than Snapdragon 695 (2600 vs 2200 MHz).
  • Dimensity 8020 has 85.06% better AnTuTu 9 score than Snapdragon 695 (687 K vs 371 K ).
  • Dimensity 8020 Support 100.59% higher memory bandwidth than Snapdragon 695 (34.1 vs 17 GB/s).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Snapdragon 695 664
Dimensity 8020 826

Multi-Core Score

icon
Snapdragon 695 1869
Dimensity 8020 3315

Image compression

icon
Snapdragon 695 111.3
Dimensity 8020

Face detection

icon
Snapdragon 695 16.9
Dimensity 8020

Speech recognition

icon
Snapdragon 695 28.8
Dimensity 8020

Machine learning

icon
Snapdragon 695 26.7
Dimensity 8020

Camera shooting

icon
Snapdragon 695 15.9
Dimensity 8020

HTML 5

icon
Snapdragon 695 2.25
Dimensity 8020

SQLite

icon
Snapdragon 695 579.5
Dimensity 8020

3DMark

Stability 99%

Graphics test 7 FPS
Stability 99%

Graphics test 13 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display FHD+ @ 120 Hz Full HD+ @144 Hz, QHD+ @90 Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR HDR10 HDR10+
  • Color Depth Up to 10-bit -
  • Color Gamut Rec2020 -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

58%
Turbo Clock Speed

2200 MHz

69%
Turbo Clock Speed

2600 MHz

77%
Base Frequency

1700 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 2x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A77)
    6x 1.7 GHz – Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55)
    4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A78
    4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A -
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 6 nm 6 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP 6 W 4 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Adreno 619 Mali-G77 MC9
  • Architecture Adreno 600 Valhall
  • GPU frequency 840 MHz -
  • Execution units - 9
  • Shading units 128 144
  • FLOPS 536 Gigaflops -
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 17 Gbit/s 34.1 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 8 GB 12 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
  • Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 686 MediaTek APU 570
  • Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2 UFS 3.1
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP 1x 108MP
  • Video capture 1K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 1080p at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem Snapdragon X51 -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 21
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • Wi-Fi 6 6
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.2
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Qualcomm Snapdragon 695

CPU
23%
GPU
17%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%

MediaTek Dimensity 8020

CPU
35%
GPU
31%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote