Overview - Snapdragon 695 Vs Snapdragon 685

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Snapdragon 695 vs Snapdragon 685 SoCs by Qualcomm. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Snapdragon 695 23
Snapdragon 685 17
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Snapdragon 695 17
Snapdragon 685 11
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Snapdragon 695 79
Snapdragon 685 79
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Snapdragon 695 40
Snapdragon 685 36
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Snapdragon 695 Snapdragon 685
CPU 115765 81894
GPU 93638 39122
Memory 60715 77991
UX 101282 71216
Total score 371400 270223
Key Differences

Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 695

  • Snapdragon 695 has 37.44% better AnTuTu 9 score than Snapdragon 685 (371 K vs 270 K).
  • Snapdragon 695 Support 105.13% higher memory bandwidth than Snapdragon 685 (800 vs 390 MHz).

Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 685

  • Snapdragon 685 has 27.27% higher CPU clock speed than Snapdragon 695 (2800 vs 2200 MHz).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Snapdragon 695 664
Snapdragon 685 377

Multi-Core Score

icon
Snapdragon 695 1869
Snapdragon 685 1609

Image compression

icon
Snapdragon 695 111.3
Snapdragon 685

Face detection

icon
Snapdragon 695 16.9
Snapdragon 685

Speech recognition

icon
Snapdragon 695 28.8
Snapdragon 685

Machine learning

icon
Snapdragon 695 26.7
Snapdragon 685

Camera shooting

icon
Snapdragon 695 15.9
Snapdragon 685

HTML 5

icon
Snapdragon 695 2.25
Snapdragon 685

SQLite

icon
Snapdragon 695 579.5
Snapdragon 685

3DMark

Stability 99%

Graphics test 7 FPS
Stability %

Graphics test -
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display FHD+ @ 120 Hz HD+ @ 120 Hz, FHD+ @ 120 Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2520 x 1080 1080 × 2520
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR HDR10 -
  • Color Depth Up to 10-bit Up to 12-bit, Up to 10-bit
  • Color Gamut Rec2020 -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

58%
Turbo Clock Speed

2200 MHz

74%
Turbo Clock Speed

2800 MHz

77%
Base Frequency

1700 MHz

86%
Base Frequency

1900 MHz

  • Architecture 2x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A77)
    6x 1.7 GHz – Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55)
    4x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A73
    4x 1.9 GHz – Cortex-A53
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 6 nm 6 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP 6 W -
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Adreno 619 Adreno 610
  • Architecture Adreno 600 Adreno 600
  • GPU frequency 840 MHz -
  • Execution units - 2
  • Shading units 128 96
  • FLOPS 536 Gigaflops -
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 17 Gbit/s 17 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 8 GB 8 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
  • Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 686 Hexagon 686
  • Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2 UFS 2.2
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP
  • Video capture 1K at 60FPS 1K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 1080p at 60FPS 1080p at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem Snapdragon X51 X11
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 13
  • 5G support Yes No
  • Wi-Fi 6 5
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.2
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Qualcomm Snapdragon 695

CPU
23%
GPU
17%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%

Qualcomm Snapdragon 685

CPU
17%
GPU
11%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote