Snapdragon 695 Vs Exynos 1330
We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Snapdragon 695 vs Exynos 1330 SoCs by Qualcomm and Samsung respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.
Review
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Key Differences
Pros of Samsung Exynos 1330
- Exynos 1330 has 9.09% higher CPU clock speed than Snapdragon 695 (2400 vs 2200 MHz).
- Exynos 1330 has 50.02% higher memory frequency than Snapdragon 695 (3200 vs 2133 MHz).
- Exynos 1330 has 16.67% smaller sized transistor than Snapdragon 695 (5 vs 6 nm).
- Exynos 1330 has 11.66% better AnTuTu 9 score than Snapdragon 695 (415 K vs 371 K ).
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarksAnTuTu 9
| CPU | 115765 | 133870 |
| GPU | 93638 | 84349 |
| Memory | 60715 | 79108 |
| UX | 101282 | 117360 |
| Total score | 371400 | 414687 |
GeekBench 5
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
| Image compression | 111.3 Mpixels/s | - |
| Face detection | 16.9 images/s | - |
| Speech recognition | 28.8 words/s | - |
| Machine learning | 26.7 images/s | - |
| Camera shooting | 15.9 images/s | - |
| HTML 5 | 2.25 Mnodes/s | - |
| SQLite | 579.5 Mnodes/s | - |
3DMark
9%
SD 6950%
Exynos 1330Score: 1204
| Stability | 99% | - |
| Graphics test | 7 FPS | - |
| Score | 1204 | - |
Specifications
Full list of technical specifications of Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 and Samsung Exynos 1330Display
| Max On-Device Display | FHD+ @ 120 Hz | FHD+ @120Hz |
| Max On-Display Resolution | 2520 x 1080 | 2960 x 1440 |
| Max External Display | - | - |
| HDR | HDR10 | - |
| Color Depth | Up to 10-bit | - |
| Color Gamut | Rec2020 | - |
CPU
64%
SD 69569%
Exynos 1330
Processor Speed (Frequency)
| Architecture |
2x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A77) 6x 1.7 GHz – Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55) |
2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Base Frequency | 1700 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Turbo Frequency | 2200 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| L1 cache | - | - |
| L2 cache | - | - |
| L3 cache | - | - |
| Process | 6 nm | 5 nm |
| Transistor count | - | - |
| TDP | 6 W | - |
Graphics
| GPU name | Adreno 619 | Mali G68 MP2 |
| Architecture | Adreno 600 | Valhal 2 |
| GPU frequency | 840 MHz | - |
| Execution units | - | 2 |
| Shading units | 128 | - |
| FLOPS | 536 Gigaflops | - |
| Vulkan version | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX version | 12 | 12 |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Bus | 2x 16 Bit | 4x 16 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | 17 Gbit/s | - |
| Max size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon 686 | Yes |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1 |
| Max display resolution | 2520 x 1080 | 2960 x 1440 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP | 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP |
| Video capture | 1K at 60FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video playback | 1080p at 60FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 | H.264, H.265, VP8 |
| Audio codecs | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
Connectivity
Download Speed
4G (MB/s)
5G (MB/s)
Upload Speed
4G (MB/s)
5G (MB/s)
| Modem | Snapdragon X51 | - |
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 18 | LTE Cat. 18 |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download speed | Up to 2500 Mbps | Up to 2550 Mbps |
| Peak Upload speed | Up to 1500 Mbps | Up to 1280 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 | 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo |
Info
| Announced Date | October 2021 | February 2023 |
| Class | Mid-range | Mid range |
| Model number | SM6375 | S5E8535 |
| Official page | Snapdragon 695 official site | Exynos 1330 official site |
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
41.5
Review By TenzysTech
Samsung Exynos 1330
38.5
Review By TenzysTech
