Overview - Snapdragon 778G Plus Vs Tensor

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Snapdragon 778G Plus vs Tensor SoCs by Qualcomm and Google respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Snapdragon 778G Plus 33
Tensor 36
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Snapdragon 778G Plus 26
Tensor 34
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Snapdragon 778G Plus 79
Tensor 82
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Snapdragon 778G Plus 46
Tensor 51
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Snapdragon 778G Plus Tensor
CPU 166382 181161
GPU 177972 294446
Memory 106394 103174
UX 130486 145388
Total score 581234 724169
Key Differences

Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus

  • Snapdragon 778G Plus has latest instruction set, hence better than Tensor.

Pros of Google Tensor

  • Tensor has 12% higher CPU clock speed than Snapdragon 778G Plus (2800 vs 2500 MHz).
  • Tensor has 54.18% higher GPU clock speed than Snapdragon 778G Plus (848 vs 550 MHz).
  • Tensor has 16.67% smaller sized transistor than Snapdragon 778G Plus (5 vs 6 nm).
  • Tensor has 24.59% better AnTuTu 9 score than Snapdragon 778G Plus (724 K vs 581 K ).
  • Tensor Support 100.00% higher memory bandwidth than Snapdragon 778G Plus (51.2 vs 25.6 GB/s).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Snapdragon 778G Plus 816
Tensor 1026

Multi-Core Score

icon
Snapdragon 778G Plus 2971
Tensor 2879

3DMark

Stability %

Graphics test 16 FPS
Stability 56%

Graphics test 37 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display FHD+ @ 144 Hz 4k, FHD+ @ 60 Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2520 x 1080 3840 x 2160
  • Max External Display 4K @ 60 Hz -
  • HDR HDR10+, HDR10 HDR
  • Color Depth Up to 10-bit -
  • Color Gamut Rec. 2020 -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

66%
Turbo Clock Speed

2500 MHz

74%
Turbo Clock Speed

2800 MHz

86%
Base Frequency

1900 MHz

82%
Base Frequency

1800 MHz

  • Architecture 1x 2.5 GHz – Kryo 670 Prime (Cortex-A78)
    3x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 670 Gold (Cortex-A78)
    4x 1.9 GHz – Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55)
    2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X1
    2x 2.25 GHz – Cortex A76
    4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.4-A ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache 2 MB 3 MB
  • L3 cache - 4 MB
  • Process 6 nm 5 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP 5 W 5.6 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Adreno 642L Mali-G78 MP20
  • Architecture Adreno 600 Valhall
  • GPU frequency 550 MHz 848 MHz
  • Execution units 2 20
  • Shading units 384 320
  • FLOPS 845 Gigaflops -
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 3200 MHz 3200 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 25.6 Gbit/s 51.2 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 16 GB 12 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
  • Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 770 Tensor Processing Unit
  • Storage type UFS 2.2, UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1 UFS 3.1
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 3840 x 2160
  • Max camera resolution 1x 192MP 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
  • Video capture 4K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem X53 Exynos 5300g
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • Wi-Fi 6 6
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.2
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus

CPU
33%
GPU
26%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%

Google Tensor

CPU
36%
GPU
34%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
82%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote