Menu

78

Points
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus

Snapdragon 778G Plus

78

Points
MediaTek Dimensity 7030

Dimensity 7030
Overview - Snapdragon 778G Plus Vs Dimensity 7030

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Snapdragon 778G Plus vs Dimensity 7030 SoCs by Qualcomm and Mediatek respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Snapdragon 778G Plus 33
Dimensity 7030 33
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Snapdragon 778G Plus 26
Dimensity 7030 21
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Snapdragon 778G Plus 79
Dimensity 7030 79
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Snapdragon 778G Plus 46
Dimensity 7030 44
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Snapdragon 778G Plus Dimensity 7030
CPU 166382 163674
GPU 177972 81587
Memory 106394 121193
UX 130486 151408
Total score 581234 517862
Key Differences

Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus

  • Snapdragon 778G Plus has 12.24% better AnTuTu 9 score than Dimensity 7030 (581 K vs 518 K).
  • Snapdragon 778G Plus has latest instruction set, hence better than Dimensity 7030.

Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 7030

  • Dimensity 7030 has 81.82% higher GPU clock speed than Snapdragon 778G Plus (1000 vs 550 MHz).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Snapdragon 778G Plus 816
Dimensity 7030 1036

Multi-Core Score

icon
Snapdragon 778G Plus 2971
Dimensity 7030 2440

3DMark

14%
Snapdragon 778G Plus
Stability %

Graphics test 16 FPS
N/A
Dimensity 7030
Stability %

Graphics test -
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display FHD+ @ 144 Hz FHD+@144Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
  • Max External Display 4K @ 60 Hz -
  • HDR HDR10+, HDR10 HDR10+ Adaptive, HLG and Dolby Vision
  • Color Depth Up to 10-bit 10-bit
  • Color Gamut Rec. 2020 -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

66%
Turbo Clock Speed

2500 MHz

66%
Turbo Clock Speed

2500 MHz

86%
Base Frequency

1900 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 1x 2.5 GHz – Kryo 670 Prime (Cortex-A78)
    3x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 670 Gold (Cortex-A78)
    4x 1.9 GHz – Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55)
     2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A78
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.4-A ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache 2 MB -
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 6 nm 6 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP 5 W -
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Adreno 642L Mali-G610 MP3
  • Architecture Adreno 600 Valhall 3rd gen
  • GPU frequency 550 MHz 1000 MHz
  • Execution units 2 3
  • Shading units 384 -
  • FLOPS 845 Gigaflops -
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.3
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 -
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 3200 MHz 3200 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 25.6 Gbit/s -
  • Max Size 16 GB 16 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
  • Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 770 MediaTek APU 550
  • Storage type UFS 2.2, UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1 UFS 2.1, UFS 3.1
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 192MP 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP
  • Video capture 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem X53 -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 18
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • Wi-Fi 6 6E
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.2
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus

Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
CPU
33%
GPU
26%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%

MediaTek Dimensity 7030

MediaTek Dimensity 7030
CPU
33%
GPU
21%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote