Overview - Snapdragon 778G Plus Vs Snapdragon 4 Gen 2

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Snapdragon 778G Plus vs Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 SoCs by Qualcomm. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Snapdragon 778G Plus 33
Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 28
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Snapdragon 778G Plus 26
Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 23
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Snapdragon 778G Plus 79
Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 86
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Snapdragon 778G Plus 46
Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 46
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Snapdragon 778G Plus Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
CPU 166382 131871
GPU 177972 163570
Memory 106394 114048
UX 130486 94884
Total score 581234 504373
Key Differences

Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus

  • Snapdragon 778G Plus has 13.64% higher CPU clock speed than Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (2500 vs 2200 MHz).
  • Snapdragon 778G Plus has 15.24% better AnTuTu 9 score than Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (581 K vs 504 K).
  • Snapdragon 778G Plus has latest instruction set, hence better than Snapdragon 4 Gen 2.

Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2

  • Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 has 73.64% higher GPU clock speed than Snapdragon 778G Plus (955 vs 550 MHz).
  • Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 has 33.33% smaller sized transistor than Snapdragon 778G Plus (4 vs 6 nm).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Snapdragon 778G Plus 816
Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 916

Multi-Core Score

icon
Snapdragon 778G Plus 2971
Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 2106

3DMark

Stability %

Graphics test 16 FPS
Stability %

Graphics test -
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display FHD+ @ 144 Hz FHD+ @ 120 Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2520 x 1080 1200 x 2520
  • Max External Display 4K @ 60 Hz -
  • HDR HDR10+, HDR10 -
  • Color Depth Up to 10-bit -
  • Color Gamut Rec. 2020 -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

66%
Turbo Clock Speed

2500 MHz

58%
Turbo Clock Speed

2200 MHz

86%
Base Frequency

1900 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 1x 2.5 GHz – Kryo 670 Prime (Cortex-A78)
    3x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 670 Gold (Cortex-A78)
    4x 1.9 GHz – Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55)
    2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A78
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.4-A ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache 2 MB -
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 6 nm 4 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP 5 W -
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Adreno 642L Adreno 613
  • Architecture Adreno 600 Adreno 600
  • GPU frequency 550 MHz 955 MHz
  • Execution units 2 -
  • Shading units 384 -
  • FLOPS 845 Gigaflops -
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 3200 MHz 3200 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 25.6 Gbit/s 25.6 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 16 GB -
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
  • Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 770 Yes
  • Storage type UFS 2.2, UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1 UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 192MP 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP
  • Video capture 4K at 30FPS 1K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 30FPS 1080p at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem X53 Snapdragon X61
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 18
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • Wi-Fi 6 5
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.1
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus

CPU
33%
GPU
26%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%

Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2

CPU
28%
GPU
23%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote