Overview - Snapdragon 778G Plus Vs Exynos 2400

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Snapdragon 778G Plus vs Exynos 2400 SoCs by Qualcomm and Samsung respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core and 10-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Snapdragon 778G Plus 33
Exynos 2400 88
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Snapdragon 778G Plus 26
Exynos 2400 76
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Snapdragon 778G Plus 79
Exynos 2400 86
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Snapdragon 778G Plus 46
Exynos 2400 83
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Snapdragon 778G Plus Exynos 2400
CPU 166382 510545
GPU 177972 587630
Memory 106394 322132
UX 130486 260123
Total score 581234 1680430
Key Differences

Pros of Samsung Exynos 2400

  • Exynos 2400 has 28.4% higher CPU clock speed than Snapdragon 778G Plus (3210 vs 2500 MHz).
  • Exynos 2400 has 83.45% higher GPU clock speed than Snapdragon 778G Plus (1009 vs 550 MHz).
  • Exynos 2400 has 31.25% higher memory frequency than Snapdragon 778G Plus (4200 vs 3200 MHz).
  • Exynos 2400 has 33.33% smaller sized transistor than Snapdragon 778G Plus (4 vs 6 nm).
  • Exynos 2400 has 189.11% better AnTuTu 9 score than Snapdragon 778G Plus (1,680 K vs 581 K ).
  • Exynos 2400 has latest instruction set, hence better than Snapdragon 778G Plus.
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Snapdragon 778G Plus 816
Exynos 2400 2193

Multi-Core Score

icon
Snapdragon 778G Plus 2971
Exynos 2400 6895

3DMark

Stability %

Graphics test 16 FPS
Stability %

Graphics test -
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display FHD+ @ 144 Hz -
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2520 x 1080 -
  • Max External Display 4K @ 60 Hz -
  • HDR HDR10+, HDR10 -
  • Color Depth Up to 10-bit -
  • Color Gamut Rec. 2020 -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

66%
Turbo Clock Speed

2500 MHz

85%
Turbo Clock Speed

3210 MHz

86%
Base Frequency

1900 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 1x 2.5 GHz – Kryo 670 Prime (Cortex-A78)
    3x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 670 Gold (Cortex-A78)
    4x 1.9 GHz – Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55)
    1x 3.21 GHz – Cortex-X4
    2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
    3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
    4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A520
  • Cores 8 10
  • Instruction set ARMv8.4-A ARMv9.2-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache 2 MB -
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 6 nm 4 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP 5 W -
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Adreno 642L Samsung Xclipse 940
  • Architecture Adreno 600 Samsung Xclipse
  • GPU frequency 550 MHz 1009 MHz
  • Execution units 2 -
  • Shading units 384 -
  • FLOPS 845 Gigaflops -
  • Vulkan version 1.1 -
  • OpenCL version 2.0 -
  • DirectX version 12 -
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 3200 MHz 4200 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 25.6 Gbit/s -
  • Max Size 16 GB 24 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5X
  • Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 770 Yes
  • Storage type UFS 2.2, UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1 UFS 4.0
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 3840 x 2400
  • Max camera resolution 1x 192MP 1x 320MP
  • Video capture 4K at 30FPS 8K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 30FPS 8K at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem X53 Exynos 5300
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • Wi-Fi 6 7
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.4
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus

CPU
33%
GPU
26%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%

Samsung Exynos 2400

CPU
88%
GPU
76%
Memory
49%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote