Overview - Snapdragon 782G Vs Exynos 2400

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Snapdragon 782G vs Exynos 2400 SoCs by Qualcomm and Samsung respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core and 10-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Snapdragon 782G 37
Exynos 2400 88
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Snapdragon 782G 31
Exynos 2400 76
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Snapdragon 782G 79
Exynos 2400 86
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Snapdragon 782G 49
Exynos 2400 83
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Snapdragon 782G Exynos 2400
CPU 172419 510545
GPU 233993 587630
Memory 98521 322132
UX 110849 260123
Total score 615782 1680430
Key Differences

Pros of Samsung Exynos 2400

  • Exynos 2400 has 18.89% higher CPU clock speed than Snapdragon 782G (3210 vs 2700 MHz).
  • Exynos 2400 has 83.45% higher GPU clock speed than Snapdragon 782G (1009 vs 550 MHz).
  • Exynos 2400 has 31.25% higher memory frequency than Snapdragon 782G (4200 vs 3200 MHz).
  • Exynos 2400 has 33.33% smaller sized transistor than Snapdragon 782G (4 vs 6 nm).
  • Exynos 2400 has 172.89% better AnTuTu 9 score than Snapdragon 782G (1,680 K vs 616 K ).
  • Exynos 2400 has latest instruction set, hence better than Snapdragon 782G.
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Snapdragon 782G 956
Exynos 2400 2193

Multi-Core Score

icon
Snapdragon 782G 3478
Exynos 2400 6895

3DMark

Stability %

Graphics test -
Stability %

Graphics test -
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display FHD+ @ 144 Hz -
  • Max On-Display Resolution 4K @ 60 Hz -
  • Max External Display 4K @ 60 Hz -
  • HDR HDR10+, HDR10, HLG -
  • Color Depth Up to 10-bit -
  • Color Gamut Rec. 2020 -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

71%
Turbo Clock Speed

2700 MHz

85%
Turbo Clock Speed

3210 MHz

86%
Base Frequency

1900 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 1x 2.7 GHz – Kryo 670 Prime core (Cortex-A78)
    3x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 670 Gold (also Cortex-A78)
    4x 1.9 GHz – Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55)
    1x 3.21 GHz – Cortex-X4
    2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
    3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
    4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A520
  • Cores 8 10
  • Instruction set ARMv8.3-A ARMv9.2-A
  • L1 cache 512 KB -
  • L2 cache 1 MB -
  • L3 cache 2 MB -
  • Process 6 nm 4 nm
  • Transistor count 4.68 Billion -
  • TDP 5 W -
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Adreno 642L Samsung Xclipse 940
  • Architecture Adreno 600 Samsung Xclipse
  • GPU frequency 550 MHz 1009 MHz
  • Execution units - -
  • Shading units 512 -
  • FLOPS 906.58 Gigaflops -
  • Vulkan version 1.1 -
  • OpenCL version 2.0 -
  • DirectX version 12 -
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 3200 MHz 4200 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 17 Gbit/s -
  • Max Size 16 GB 24 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5X
  • Bus 2x16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 770 Yes
  • Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 4.0
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 3840 x 2400
  • Max camera resolution 1x200 MP, 2x64 MP 1x 320MP
  • Video capture 4K at 30 FPS 8K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 60 FPS 8K at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem X53 Exynos 5300
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • Wi-Fi 6/6E 7
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.4
  • Navigation GLONASS, NavIC, Beidou, GPS, QZSS, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G

CPU
37%
GPU
31%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%

Samsung Exynos 2400

CPU
88%
GPU
76%
Memory
49%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote