Overview - Snapdragon 888 Plus Vs Helio G37

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Snapdragon 888 Plus vs Helio G37 SoCs by Qualcomm and Mediatek respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Snapdragon 888 Plus 43
Helio G37 14
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Snapdragon 888 Plus 39
Helio G37 8
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Snapdragon 888 Plus 82
Helio G37 57
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Snapdragon 888 Plus 55
Helio G37 26
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Snapdragon 888 Plus Helio G37
CPU 216591 37521
GPU 324286 27112
Memory 138188 33579
UX 167760 40621
Total score 846825 138833
Key Differences

Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus

  • Snapdragon 888 Plus has 30.22% higher CPU clock speed than Helio G37 (2995 vs 2300 MHz).
  • Snapdragon 888 Plus has 33.09% higher GPU clock speed than Helio G37 (905 vs 680 MHz).
  • Snapdragon 888 Plus has 100.00% higher memory frequency than Helio G37 (3200 vs 1600 MHz).
  • Snapdragon 888 Plus has 58.33% smaller sized transistor than Helio G37 (5 vs 12 nm).
  • Snapdragon 888 Plus has 509.96% better AnTuTu 9 score than Helio G37 (847 K vs 139 K).
  • Snapdragon 888 Plus has latest instruction set, hence better than Helio G37.
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Snapdragon 888 Plus 1171
Helio G37 914

Multi-Core Score

icon
Snapdragon 888 Plus 3704
Helio G37 178

3DMark

Stability 99%

Graphics test 33 FPS
Stability %

Graphics test -
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display 4K Ultra HD @ 60 Hz, QHD+ @ 144 Hz Full HD+ @90 Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 3840 x 2160 2400 x 1080
  • Max External Display 4K @ 60 Hz -
  • HDR Hybrid Log Gamma (HLG), HDR10+, Dolby Vision®, HDR10 -
  • Color Depth Up to 10-bit -
  • Color Gamut Rec. 2020 -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

79%
Turbo Clock Speed

2995 MHz

61%
Turbo Clock Speed

2300 MHz

82%
Base Frequency

1800 MHz

82%
Base Frequency

1800 MHz

  • Architecture 1x 2.995 GHz – Kryo 680 Prime (Cortex-X1)
    3x 2.42 GHz – Kryo 680 Gold (Cortex-A78)
    4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 680 Silver (Cortex-A55)
    4x 2.3 GHz – Cortex-A53
    4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.4-A ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache 512 KB -
  • L2 cache 1 MB -
  • L3 cache 4 MB -
  • Process 5 nm 12 nm
  • Transistor count 10.3 Billion -
  • TDP 8 W 2.2 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Adreno 660 IMG PowerVR GE8320
  • Architecture Adreno 600 Rogue
  • GPU frequency 905 MHz 680 MHz
  • Execution units 2 2
  • Shading units 512 64
  • FLOPS 1853 Gigaflops 56 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 1.2
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 3200 MHz 1600 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 51.2 Gbit/s 13.9 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 24 GB 8 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
  • Bus 4x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 780 No
  • Storage type UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1 eMMC 5.1
  • Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 2400 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 2000MP, 2x 25MP 1x 50MP, 2x 13MP
  • Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 1K at 30FPS
  • Video playback 8K at 30FPS 1080p at 30FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 H.264, H.265
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem X60 -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 22 LTE Cat. 7
  • 5G support Yes No
  • Wi-Fi 6 5
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.0
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus

CPU
43%
GPU
39%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
82%

MediaTek Helio G37

CPU
14%
GPU
8%
Memory
19%
Energy efficiency and battery life
57%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote